Suppr超能文献

原发性舌根癌治疗后的生存和功能结局:根治性放化疗与手术加辅助放疗的比较。

Survival and Functional Outcome after Treatment for Primary Base of Tongue Cancer: A Comparison of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Oct;50(4):1214-1225. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.498. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes in patients with primary base of tongue (BOT) cancer who received definitive radiotherapy (RT) or surgery followed by radiotherapy (SRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2002 andDecember 2016, 102 patientswith stage I-IVB primary BOT cancer underwent either definitive RT (n=46) or SRT (n=56), and treatment outcomeswere compared between two groups. The expression of p16 was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The RT group had more patients with advanced T stage (T3-4) disease (58.7% vs. 35.7%, p=0.021) and who received chemotherapy (91.3% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.001) than the SRT group. At a median followup of 36.9 months (range, 3.3 to 181.5 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 75.5% and 68.7%, respectively. With respect to treatment group, the 5-year OS and DFS in the RT and SRT groups did not differ significantly (OS, 68.7% vs. 80.5%, p=0.601; DFS, 63.1% vs. 73.1%, p=0.653). In multivariate analysis, OS differed significantly according to p16 expression (p16-negative vs. p16- positive; hazard ratio [HR], 0.145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.025 to 0.853; p=0.033). Regarding DFS, p16 expression (p16-negative vs. p16-positive; HR, 0.164; 95% CI, 0.045 to 0.598; p=0.006) showed a significant effect in multivariate analysis. Functional defects (late grade ≥ 3 dysphagia or voice alteration) were more frequently reported in the SRT than in the RT group (16.1% vs. 2.2%, p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

Despite advanced disease, patients in the RT group showed comparable survival outcomes and better functional preservation than those in the SRT group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较接受根治性放疗(RT)或手术加放疗(SRT)的原发性舌根(BOT)癌患者的临床和功能结局。

材料和方法

2002 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月,102 例 I-IVB 期原发性 BOT 癌患者接受了根治性 RT(n=46)或 SRT(n=56)治疗,比较了两组患者的治疗结果。还分析了 p16 的表达。

结果

RT 组 T 期较晚(T3-4)的患者比例(58.7% vs. 35.7%,p=0.021)和接受化疗的患者比例(91.3% vs. 37.5%,p < 0.001)均高于 SRT 组。中位随访 36.9 个月(范围 3.3 至 181.5 个月)时,5 年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为 75.5%和 68.7%。关于治疗组,RT 组和 SRT 组的 5 年 OS 和 DFS 无显著差异(OS:68.7% vs. 80.5%,p=0.601;DFS:63.1% vs. 73.1%,p=0.653)。多因素分析显示,OS 与 p16 表达显著相关(p16 阴性 vs. p16 阳性;HR:0.145;95%CI:0.025 至 0.853;p=0.033)。DFS 方面,p16 表达(p16 阴性 vs. p16 阳性;HR:0.164;95%CI:0.045 至 0.598;p=0.006)在多因素分析中也有显著影响。SRT 组的功能缺陷(晚期≥3 级吞咽困难或声音改变)发生率高于 RT 组(16.1% vs. 2.2%,p=0.021)。

结论

尽管疾病较晚,RT 组患者的生存结果与 SRT 组相当,且功能保存更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5652/6192900/158a9c73277b/crt-2017-498f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验