Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Bld 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 28;12(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0687-4.
Web-based interventions to support people to manage long-term health conditions are available and effective but rarely used in clinical services. The aim of this study is to identify critical factors impacting on the implementation of an online supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with recent onset psychosis or bipolar disorder into routine clinical care and to use this information to inform an implementation plan to facilitate widespread use and inform wider implementation of digital health interventions.
A multiple case study design within six early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services in England, will be used to test and refine theory-driven hypotheses about factors impacting on implementation of the Relatives' Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT). Qualitative data including behavioural observation, document analysis, and in-depth interviews collected in the first two EIP services (wave 1) and analysed using framework analysis, combined with quantitative data describing levels of use by staff and relatives and impact on relatives' distress and wellbeing, will be used to identify factors impacting on implementation. Consultation via stakeholder workshops with staff and relatives and co-facilitated by relatives in the research team will inform development of an implementation plan to address these factors, which will be evaluated and refined in the four subsequent EIP services in waves 2 and 3. Transferability of the implementation plan to non-participating services will be explored.
Observation of implementation in a real world clinical setting, across carefully sampled services, in real time provides a unique opportunity to understand factors impacting on implementation likely to be generalizable to other web-based interventions, as well as informing further development of implementation theories. However, there are inherent challenges in investigating implementation without influencing the process under observation. We outline our strategies to ensure our design is transparent, flexible, and responsive to the timescales and activities happening within each service whilst also meeting the aims of the project.
ISCTRN 16267685 (09/03/2016).
支持人们管理长期健康状况的基于网络的干预措施已经存在并且有效,但在临床服务中很少使用。本研究的目的是确定影响将在线支持的自我管理干预措施应用于近期发病的精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者的亲属的常规临床护理中的关键因素,并利用这些信息为实施计划提供信息,以促进广泛使用并为数字健康干预措施的更广泛实施提供信息。
在英格兰的六个早期精神病干预服务中心(EIP)中进行多案例研究设计,将用于测试和完善有关影响实施亲属教育和应对工具包(REACT)的理论驱动假设。定性数据包括在头两个 EIP 服务(第 1 波)中收集的行为观察、文件分析和深入访谈,使用框架分析进行分析,并结合描述工作人员和亲属使用水平以及对亲属的影响的定量数据痛苦和幸福感,将用于确定影响实施的因素。通过与工作人员和亲属进行利益相关者研讨会进行磋商,并由研究团队中的亲属共同促进,将为解决这些因素制定实施计划提供信息,该计划将在随后的四个 EIP 服务中(第 2 波和第 3 波)进行评估和完善。将探讨将实施计划推广到非参与服务的可转移性。
在实时、精心采样的服务中,在真实世界的临床环境中观察实施情况,为了解可能适用于其他基于网络的干预措施的实施影响因素提供了独特的机会,同时也为进一步发展实施理论提供了信息。然而,在不影响观察过程的情况下调查实施情况存在固有挑战。我们概述了我们的策略,以确保我们的设计透明、灵活,并对每个服务中的时间安排和活动做出反应,同时也满足项目的目标。
ISCTRN 16267685(2016 年 3 月 9 日)。