Scott Jennifer L, Dawkins Sarah, Quinn Michael G, Sanderson Kristy, Elliott Kate-Ellen J, Stirling Christine, Schüz Ben, Robinson Andrew
a School of Medicine (Psychology) , University of Tasmania , Hobart , Australia.
b Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Tasmania , University of Tasmania , Hobart , Australia.
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Aug;20(8):793-803. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1040724. Epub 2015 May 15.
Face-to-face delivery of CBT is not always optimal or practical for informal dementia carers (DCs). Technology-based formats of CBT delivery (TB-CBT) have been developed with the aim to improve client engagement and accessibility, and lower delivery costs, and offers potential benefits for DCs. However, research of TB-CBT for DCs has maintained heavy reliance on therapist involvement. The efficacy of pure TB-CBT interventions for DCs is not currently established Methods: A systematic review of trials of pure TB-CBT intervention for DCs from 1995 was conducted. PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, Scopus and MedLine databases were searched using key terms related to CBT, carers and dementia. Four hundred and forty two articles were identified, and inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied; studies were only retained if quantitative data was available, and there was no active therapist contact. Four articles were retained; two randomized and two waitlist control trials. Methodological and reporting quality was assessed. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcome measures of caregiver depression.
Meta-analysis revealed small significant post-intervention effects of pure TB-CBT interventions for depression; equivalent to face-to-face interventions. However, there is no evidence regarding long-term efficacy of pure TB-CBT for DCs. The systematic review further identified critical methodological and reporting shortcomings pertaining to these trials Conclusions: Pure TB-CBT interventions may offer a convenient, economical method for delivering psychological interventions to DCs. Future research needs to investigate their long-term efficacy, and consider potential moderating and mediating factors underpinning the mechanisms of effect of these programs. This will help to provide more targeted interventions to this underserviced population.
对于非正式痴呆症照料者(DCs)而言,面对面提供认知行为疗法(CBT)并不总是最佳或可行的方式。基于技术的CBT交付形式(TB-CBT)已被开发出来,旨在提高客户参与度和可及性,并降低交付成本,对DCs具有潜在益处。然而,关于DCs的TB-CBT研究一直严重依赖治疗师的参与。目前尚未确定纯TB-CBT干预对DCs的疗效。方法:对1995年以来DCs纯TB-CBT干预试验进行系统综述。使用与CBT、照料者和痴呆症相关的关键词搜索PsycINFO、Cochrane综述、Scopus和MedLine数据库。共识别出442篇文章,并应用纳入/排除标准;仅保留有定量数据且无治疗师主动联系的研究。保留了4篇文章;2篇随机对照试验和2篇等待列表对照试验。评估了方法学和报告质量。对照料者抑郁的结局指标进行了荟萃分析。
荟萃分析显示,纯TB-CBT干预对抑郁有小的但显著的干预后效果;与面对面干预相当。然而,没有证据表明纯TB-CBT对DCs的长期疗效。系统综述进一步确定了这些试验在方法学和报告方面的关键缺陷。结论:纯TB-CBT干预可能为向DCs提供心理干预提供一种方便、经济的方法。未来的研究需要调查其长期疗效,并考虑这些项目效果机制背后的潜在调节和中介因素。这将有助于为这一服务不足的人群提供更有针对性的干预措施。