• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Frailty measurement and outcomes in interventional studies: protocol for a systematic review of randomised control trials.干预性研究中的衰弱测量与结果:一项随机对照试验系统评价的方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 26;7(12):e018872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018872.
2
Management of frailty: a protocol of a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.衰弱管理:一项随机对照试验网络荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;6(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0522-7.
3
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施以维持老年人的独立性,按虚弱程度分层:一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 15;11(2):e045637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045637.
4
Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.左乙拉西坦治疗儿童癫痫的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析的伞状评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 10;9(7):e029811. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029811.
5
Multidimensional instruments with an integral approach to identify frailty in community-dwelling people: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.多维工具采用整体方法识别社区居住人群的虚弱程度:系统心理测量学综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e033160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033160.
6
Frailty Levels In Geriatric Hospital paTients (FLIGHT)-the prevalence of frailty among geriatric populations within hospital ward settings: a systematic review protocol.老年医院患者脆弱性水平(FLIGHT)研究——医院病房环境下老年人群体虚弱的患病率:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 24;9(8):e030147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030147.
7
Evaluating the effectiveness of exercise training on elderly patients who require haemodialysis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估运动训练对需要血液透析的老年患者的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 May 26;6(5):e010990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010990.
8
β-Blockers in sepsis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.β 受体阻滞剂在脓毒症中的应用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e012466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012466.
9
Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention on preventing development of frailty in pre-frail older people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.多因素干预对预防衰弱前期老年人衰弱发生的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 9;5(2):e007091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007091.
10
Diagnostic and predictive accuracy of the Clinical Frailty Scale among hospitalised older medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.临床虚弱量表在住院老年医学患者中的诊断和预测准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e040765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040765.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association between Frailty and All-Cause Mortality in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals: An Umbrella Review.衰弱与社区居住老年人全因死亡率的关系:伞式综述。
J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(4):320-326. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2021.20.
2
Moving Towards Common Data Elements and Core Outcome Measures in Frailty Research.迈向衰弱研究中的通用数据元素和核心结局指标
J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(1):14-22. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2019.43.
3
Care plans for the older heart failure patient.老年心力衰竭患者的护理计划。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Dec;21(Suppl L):L32-L35. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz243. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Assess frailty but avoid frailtyism.评估虚弱,但避免虚弱主义。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Dec;21(Suppl L):L17-L19. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz239. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Current situation of frailty screening tools for older adults.老年人虚弱筛查工具的现状。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1123-4.
6
Identification and management of frailty in the primary care setting.基层医疗环境中衰弱的识别与管理。
CMAJ. 2018 Sep 24;190(38):E1134-E1140. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171509.

本文引用的文献

1
Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study.急性呼吸衰竭幸存者临床研究的核心结局指标。一项国际改良德尔菲共识研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 1;196(9):1122-1130. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201702-0372OC.
2
Nonpharmacological interventions to treat physical frailty and sarcopenia in older patients: a systematic overview - the SENATOR Project ONTOP Series.老年患者身体虚弱和肌肉减少症的非药物干预:系统综述——参议员项目ONTOP系列
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Apr 24;12:721-740. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S132496. eCollection 2017.
3
High Prevalence of Physical Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Malnourished Older Adults-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社区营养不良老年人身体虚弱的高患病率——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 May 1;18(5):374-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.074. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
4
Prevalence of frailty in Canadians 18-79 years old in the Canadian Health Measures Survey.加拿大健康措施调查中18至79岁加拿大人的衰弱患病率。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0423-6.
5
Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies.干预措施预防或降低社区居住的老年人衰弱水平:文献和国际政策的范围综述。
Age Ageing. 2017 May 1;46(3):383-392. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw247.
6
Biology of frailty: Modulation of ageing genes and its importance to prevent age-associated loss of function.脆弱生物学:衰老基因的调节及其在预防与年龄相关的功能丧失中的重要性。
Mol Aspects Med. 2016 Aug;50:88-108. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 6.
7
Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.帮助老年人做出健康决策的决策辅助工具:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Apr 21;16:45. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0281-8.
8
Prevalence of Frailty in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.养老机构中衰弱的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):940-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.025. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

干预性研究中的衰弱测量与结果:一项随机对照试验系统评价的方案

Frailty measurement and outcomes in interventional studies: protocol for a systematic review of randomised control trials.

作者信息

Shears Melissa, McGolrick Danielle, Waters Braden, Jakab Marnie, Boyd J Gordon, Muscedere John

机构信息

School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 26;7(12):e018872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018872.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018872
PMID:29282270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5988125/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is associated with reduced functional capacity, decreased resistance to stressors and is predictive of a range of adverse health outcomes, including dependency, hospitalisation and mortality. Early identification of frailty may prevent, reduce and postpone adverse health outcomes. However, there is a need for additional evidence to guide decision-making for the care of frail patients since frail persons are frequently excluded from studies, the differential impact of frailty is often not examined in clinical trials and few large-scale clinical trials examining frail cohorts have been conducted. Randomised control trials (RCTs) published to date have used a diverse range of definitions of frailty, as well as a variety of outcome measures. The objective of this systematic review is to comprehensively characterise the frail populations enrolled and the end points reported in frailty RCTs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will identify all RCTs reporting on the outcome of interventions in adult (age ≥18 years) frail populations as defined by authors, in all settings of care. Databases will include MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Global Health, the Joanna Briggs database and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently determine trial eligibility. For each included trial, we will conduct duplicate independent data extraction, inter-rater reliability, risk of bias assessment and evaluation of the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review will comprehensively identify RCTs including frail patients to identify how frailty is measured and which outcomes are reported. The results of this systematic review may inform clinicians caring for persons with frailty, facilitate conduct of future RCTs and inform future efforts to develop common data elements and core outcomes for frailty studies. Our findings will be disseminated through conference presentation and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017065233.

摘要

引言

衰弱与功能能力下降、对应激源的抵抗力降低相关,并且可预测一系列不良健康结局,包括失能、住院和死亡。早期识别衰弱可能预防、减少和推迟不良健康结局。然而,由于衰弱者经常被排除在研究之外,衰弱的差异影响在临床试验中往往未得到检验,并且很少有针对衰弱队列的大规模临床试验,因此需要更多证据来指导衰弱患者护理的决策制定。迄今为止发表的随机对照试验(RCT)使用了多种衰弱定义以及各种结局指标。本系统评价的目的是全面描述纳入的衰弱人群以及衰弱RCT中报告的终点。

方法与分析

我们将识别所有报告针对作者定义的成年(年龄≥18岁)衰弱人群干预结局的RCT,涵盖所有护理环境。数据库将包括MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycInfo、全球健康、乔安娜·布里格斯数据库和Cochrane图书馆。两名评审员将独立确定试验的合格性。对于每项纳入的试验,我们将进行重复独立的数据提取、评分者间信度、偏倚风险评估,并使用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价方法评估证据质量。

伦理与传播

本系统评价将全面识别纳入衰弱患者的RCT,以确定如何测量衰弱以及报告了哪些结局。本系统评价的结果可能为护理衰弱患者的临床医生提供信息,促进未来RCT的开展,并为未来制定衰弱研究的通用数据元素和核心结局提供信息。我们的研究结果将通过会议报告和在同行评审期刊上发表进行传播。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42017065233。