1Food Science and Human Nutrition Department,University of Florida,Gainesville,FL,USA.
2Department of Medicine,Stanford Center for Clinical Research,Stanford,CA,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(5):896-901. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000945. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
To validate a novel photographic portion guide as a tool to estimate consumption of fish and shrimp. Application of such a validated tool can facilitate accurate individual and community seafood intake assessments and provide meaningful data relative to health benefits and hazard assessment, particularly in response to environmental contamination and disasters.
A photographic fish and shrimp portion guide presenting a stepped range of cooked portion sizes was used by participants to estimate their typical portion sizes. Participants selected their typical portion size from the photographic guide and also from a selection of freshly cooked reference meals. Photographic portions selections were compared with plated reference portions for each participant.
Academic sensory testing laboratory in the USA.
Separate groups of adults (25-64 years) contributed to fish (n 54) and shrimp (n 53) portion size comparison studies.
In the fish study, there was no difference between photographic portion selections (6·59 (sd 2·65) oz (186·8 (sd 75·1) g)) and reference plate selections (7·04 (sd 2·63) oz (199·6 (sd 74·6) g); P=0·384). Similarly in the shrimp study, there was no difference between photographic portion selections (6·88 (sd 3·40) oz (195·0 (sd 96·4) g)) and reference plate selections (6·06 (sd 2·65) oz (171·8 (sd 75·1) g); P=0·159). Photographic portions predicted plated reference portions for both fish and shrimp based on linear regression (P<0·001). Bland-Altman plot analyses showed good agreement between the two methods, <1 oz (<28·3 g) bias, in both fish and shrimp studies.
This validated photographic seafood portion guide provides a utilitarian tool for accurately assessing fish and shrimp intake in a community setting.
验证一种新的照片式海鲜份量指南,作为评估鱼类和虾类摄入量的工具。这种经验证的工具的应用可以方便准确地评估个人和社区的海鲜摄入量,并提供与健康益处和危害评估相关的有意义的数据,特别是在应对环境污染和灾害时。
参与者使用一种呈现一系列煮熟的份量的照片式鱼和虾份量指南来估计他们的典型份量。参与者从照片指南和一系列新鲜烹饪的参考餐中选择他们的典型份量。对每个参与者来说,照片份量选择与 plated 参考份量进行比较。
美国学术感官测试实验室。
两组成年人(25-64 岁)分别参与鱼类(n 54)和虾类(n 53)份量比较研究。
在鱼类研究中,照片份量选择(6.59(sd 2.65)盎司(186.8(sd 75.1)克))和参考盘份量选择(7.04(sd 2.63)盎司(199.6(sd 74.6)克);P=0.384)之间没有差异。同样,在虾类研究中,照片份量选择(6.88(sd 3.40)盎司(195.0(sd 96.4)克))和参考盘份量选择(6.06(sd 2.65)盎司(171.8(sd 75.1)克);P=0.159)之间也没有差异。基于线性回归,照片份量预测了鱼类和虾类的 plated 参考份量(P<0.001)。Bland-Altman 图谱分析表明,两种方法之间具有良好的一致性,偏差小于 1 盎司(<28.3 克),在鱼类和虾类研究中均如此。
这种经过验证的照片式海鲜份量指南为在社区环境中准确评估鱼类和虾类摄入量提供了一种实用工具。