Charles-Ayinde Makyba K, Stuchal Leah D, Mathews Anne E, Kane Andrew S
Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Current: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
J Environ Public Health. 2020 Apr 8;2020:2704074. doi: 10.1155/2020/2704074. eCollection 2020.
Estimates for fish and shellfish intake are used to inform communities and healthcare systems about potential health risks and benefits for individuals, communities, and vulnerable populations. A dietary assessment instrument was designed for use in populations of high-end consumers of seafood to examine intake of finfish, shrimp, oysters, and blue crab in coastal communities across the Gulf of Mexico.
To validate the reliability of a novel food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for seafood intake.
Test-retest reliability of the FFQ, which included a species-specific photographic portion guide, was evaluated by the inperson administration and readministration of the instrument with each participant by the same interviewer. Responses from coastal and noncoastal participants were compared to discern FFQ reliability in heterogeneous samples. . A convenience sample of 27 coastal participants from Cedar Key, Steinhatchee, and Apalachicola, Florida, reported data for 101 household members; and 15 noncoastal participants from Gainesville, Florida, reported for 42 household members. . Repeated measures from the FFQ were evaluated using correlation concordance for continuous variables (age, weight, and height) and kappa coefficient for categorical variables (type, amount, and frequency of seafood consumed).
Concordance correlation coefficient (1.00) and kappa coefficient ( = 0.73 to 1.00) for yearly and seasonal seafood consumption indicated substantial to almost perfect reproducibility, i.e., participants provided responses that were reproducible. Test-retest agreement was highest for coastal participants who consumed more seafood, as compared to occasional, noncoastal consumers, based on the intergroup comparison of kappa coefficients for yearly and seasonal seafood consumption ( = 0.69 to 0.99).
The seafood FFQ instrument evaluated in this study, included as a supplement to this report, used in tandem with a photographic portion guide, provides a utilitarian tool for assessing fish, shrimp, oyster, and blue crab intake dynamics in adult and youth populations drawn from coastal communities.
鱼类和贝类摄入量的估计用于向社区和医疗保健系统通报对个人、社区和弱势群体潜在的健康风险和益处。设计了一种饮食评估工具,用于墨西哥湾沿岸社区的海鲜高端消费者群体,以调查鳍鱼、虾、牡蛎和蓝蟹的摄入量。
验证一种新型海鲜摄入量食物频率问卷(FFQ)的可靠性。
通过同一访谈员对每位参与者亲自发放和重新发放该问卷,评估包含特定物种照片部分指南的FFQ的重测信度。比较沿海和非沿海参与者的回答,以辨别异质样本中FFQ的可靠性。从佛罗里达州锡达礁、斯坦哈奇和阿巴拉契科拉选取了27名沿海参与者作为便利样本,报告了101名家庭成员的数据;从佛罗里达州盖恩斯维尔选取了15名非沿海参与者,报告了42名家庭成员的数据。使用连续变量(年龄、体重和身高)的相关一致性和分类变量(食用海鲜的类型、数量和频率)的kappa系数评估FFQ的重复测量结果。
年度和季节性海鲜消费的一致性相关系数(1.00)和kappa系数(=0.73至1.00)表明具有高度至几乎完美的可重复性,即参与者的回答具有可重复性。根据年度和季节性海鲜消费的kappa系数组间比较(=0.69至0.99),与偶尔食用海鲜的非沿海消费者相比,食用海鲜较多的沿海参与者的重测一致性最高。
本研究中评估的海鲜FFQ工具(作为本报告的补充内容)与照片部分指南一起使用时,为评估沿海社区成年和青年人群中鳍鱼、虾、牡蛎和蓝蟹的摄入动态提供了一种实用工具。