Turconi G, Guarcello M, Berzolari F Gigli, Carolei A, Bazzano R, Roggi C
Department of Applied Health Sciences, Section of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59(8):923-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602162.
To test the validity of a colour food photography atlas for quantifying portion size eaten compared with weighed foods.
The colour food photography atlas was prepared by cooking, weighing and taking digital photographs of three portion sizes of 434 foods and beverages typical of the Italian diet.
In all, 448 male and female volunteers aged 6-60 y from a wide variety of social backgrounds completed 9075 assessments of food portions eaten at lunch and dinner in relation to a set of colour food photographs during 8 weeks of investigation. The amounts of foods eaten by individuals in five different cafeterias in Pavia, Northern Italy, were weighed by trained investigators at the time of serving and, within 5-10 min of the end of the meal, each subject was asked to quantify all foods consumed with reference to one of the three food photographs or in terms of virtual portions among those shown in the photographs.
Multiple regression analysis shows that weights of portion sizes chosen from the set of photographs are significantly associated (P<0.05) to weights of eaten portions (beta=0.81; R(2)=0.70) and are independent of age, gender and BMI. The differences between mean weights of the portions chosen by individuals from photographs and mean weights of eaten foods are significant for all food categories (P<0.05), except for bread. However, because of the very large number of observations, the mean differences are very small (range: from +23.2 g (+11.2%) for first courses to -1.3 g (-2.7%) for bread). Bland-Altman plots show that first courses limits of agreement are wide because the dispersion is increasing while weights are rising.
The use of a series of three photographs and virtual portion sizes being associated with relatively small errors, our findings support the validity of using this colour food photography atlas as a tool for quantifying food portion size in epidemiological dietary surveys on different age groups of Italian subjects.
测试一本彩色食物摄影图谱在量化所吃食物分量方面的有效性,并与称重食物进行比较。
通过烹饪、称重并拍摄434种意大利饮食中典型食物和饮料的三种分量大小的数码照片,编制了彩色食物摄影图谱。
共有448名年龄在6至60岁、来自各种社会背景的男性和女性志愿者,在为期8周的调查中,针对一组彩色食物照片,完成了9075次关于午餐和晚餐所吃食物分量的评估。在意大利北部帕维亚的五个不同自助餐厅,由训练有素的调查人员在提供食物时对个人所吃食物的量进行称重,并且在 meal结束后的5至10分钟内,要求每个受试者参照三张食物照片之一或照片中所示的虚拟分量来量化所摄入的所有食物。
多元回归分析表明,从照片组中选择的分量大小的重量与所吃食物分量的重量显著相关(P<0.05)(β=0.81;R²=0.70),并且与年龄、性别和BMI无关。除面包外,所有食物类别中,个人从照片中选择的分量平均重量与所吃食物的平均重量之间的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,由于观察次数非常多,平均差异非常小(范围:从第一道菜肴的+23.2克(+11.2%)到面包的-1.3克(-2.7%))。Bland-Altman图显示,第一道菜肴的一致性界限很宽,因为随着重量增加,离散度在增大。
使用一系列三张照片和虚拟分量大小的误差相对较小,我们的研究结果支持将这本彩色食物摄影图谱用作在针对不同年龄组意大利受试者的流行病学饮食调查中量化食物分量大小的工具的有效性。