G.S.V.M. Medical College, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Kanpur, India.
S.M.M.H. Medical College, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Saharanpur, India.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 May-Jun;71(3):259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is usually performed in patients with an anticipated difficult airway. Various sedation regimens are used during AFOI, however, most of them cause respiratory depression. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of fentanyl with ketamine versus dexmedetomidine in search of a better sedation regimen which would achieve desirable intubating conditions and hemodynamic stability without causing respiratory depression.
This is a single centered randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients of both sexes between age 18-55 years and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I-II with an anticipated difficult airway were randomly divided into two groups of thirty each. Group FK patients received intravenous fentanyl and ketamine, and group DX patients received dexmedetomidine, until Ramsay sedation scale ≥ 2. Heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP), oxygen saturation (SpO), respiratory rate (RR), endoscopy time, intubation time, first end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO) after intubation, endoscopist satisfaction score, and patient discomfort score were recorded during the study period. The level of recall was assessed on the next postoperative day.
Endoscopist satisfaction score was better in group DX patients (p < 0.05). There was a smaller variation in HR and MBP from baseline with dexmedetomidine compared to fentanyl with ketamine. First ETCO after intubation was higher in group FK patients (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in patient discomfort score, intubation time, RR, SpO and level of recall of the event.
The use of dexmedetomidine in AFOI provides better intubating conditions and hemodynamic stability compared to fentanyl with ketamine.
清醒纤维支气管镜插管术(AFOI)通常在预计有困难气道的患者中进行。在 AFOI 期间使用了各种镇静方案,但大多数方案会导致呼吸抑制。本研究旨在比较芬太尼与氯胺酮与右美托咪啶的效果,以寻找一种更好的镇静方案,在不引起呼吸抑制的情况下实现理想的插管条件和血流动力学稳定性。
这是一项单中心随机、双盲临床试验。将年龄在 18-55 岁之间且 ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)身体状况 I-II 级并预计有困难气道的男女患者随机分为两组,每组 30 例。FK 组患者接受静脉注射芬太尼和氯胺酮,DX 组患者接受右美托咪啶,直至 Ramsay 镇静评分≥2。记录研究期间的心率(HR)、平均血压(MBP)、血氧饱和度(SpO)、呼吸频率(RR)、内镜时间、插管时间、插管后第一呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO)、内镜医师满意度评分和患者不适评分。在术后第二天评估回忆水平。
DX 组患者的内镜医师满意度评分更好(p<0.05)。与芬太尼与氯胺酮相比,右美托咪啶使 HR 和 MBP 从基线的变化更小。FK 组患者插管后第一 ETCO 更高(p<0.05)。患者不适评分、插管时间、RR、SpO 和事件回忆水平无显著差异。
与芬太尼与氯胺酮相比,AFOI 中使用右美托咪啶可提供更好的插管条件和血流动力学稳定性。