Suppr超能文献

比较和评估四种粘结水门汀在不同pH值人工唾液中浸泡后的吸附性和溶解性。

To Compare and Evaluate the Sorption and Solubility of Four Luting Cements after Immersion in Artificial Saliva of Different pH Values.

作者信息

Bharali Kadambari, Das Manjula, Jalan Silpi, Paul Rajdeep, Deka Adrija

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Regional Dental College, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Regional Dental College, Guwahati, Assam, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S103-S106. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_153_17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The word 'luting' is derived from a latin word 'Lutum' which means 'mud'. 'Luting' is a word that is often used to describe the use of a mouldable substance to seal a space or to cement two components together. Therefore in view of the clinical importance of dissolution of luting cements in the oral environment, an in vitro study was designed to compare the sorption and solubility of commercially available luting cements mainly zinc phosphate, Glass Ionomer cement, Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin Cement after immersion in artificial saliva of different ph values of 5 and 7.

AIM

To Compare and Evaluate the sorption and solubility of four luting cements after immersion in artificial saliva of different pH values.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A total of 120 test samples were prepared of which 30 samples of each luting cement were prepared for the purpose of assessing the water solubility and sorptionThese luting cements were grouped as: GROUP- A (Zinc Phosphate cement), GROUP- B (Glass Ionomer Cement), GROUP-C (Resin Modified Cement), GROUP- D (Resin Cement) In these groups, based on immersion of artificial saliva of acidic pH 5 and neutral pH7, the luting cement specimens were subdivided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The volume (V) of each specimen was calculated using mathematical formula.

CONCLUSION

Resin cement had the highest resistance to solubility and sorption followed by resin modified GIC, Conventional GIC, and Zinc Phosphate which exhibited the least resistance to solubility in both artificial saliva of pH 5 and pH 7.

摘要

引言

“黏固”一词源于拉丁语“Lutum”,意为“泥浆”。“黏固”常被用于描述使用可塑形物质来密封空间或将两个部件黏合在一起。因此,鉴于口腔环境中黏固水门汀溶解的临床重要性,设计了一项体外研究,以比较市售黏固水门汀(主要是磷酸锌水门汀、玻璃离子水门汀、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和树脂水门汀)在pH值为5和7的不同人工唾液中浸泡后的吸附性和溶解性。

目的

比较和评估四种黏固水门汀在不同pH值人工唾液中浸泡后的吸附性和溶解性。

材料与方法

共制备120个测试样本,每种黏固水门汀制备30个样本,用于评估水溶性和吸附性。这些黏固水门汀分为:A组(磷酸锌水门汀)、B组(玻璃离子水门汀)、C组(树脂改性水门汀)、D组(树脂水门汀)。在这些组中,根据在酸性pH值5和中性pH值7的人工唾液中浸泡情况,将黏固水门汀标本再细分为每组15个样本的2组。使用数学公式计算每个标本的体积(V)。

结论

树脂水门汀对溶解性和吸附性的抵抗力最强,其次是树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、传统玻璃离子水门汀和磷酸锌水门汀,在pH值为5和pH值为7的人工唾液中,磷酸锌水门汀对溶解性的抵抗力最弱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e2/5730993/b516e6fc0d26/JPBS-9-103-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验