• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于腹盆腔计算机断层扫描对腹水进行量化以预测肝硬化患者的院内死亡率。

Quantification of ascites based on abdomino-pelvic computed tomography scans for predicting the in-hospital mortality of liver cirrhosis.

作者信息

Wang Ran, Qi Xingshun, Guo Xiaozhong

机构信息

Liver Cirrhosis Study Group, Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, Liaoning 110840, P.R. China.

Postgraduate College, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning 110840, P.R. China.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2017 Dec;14(6):5733-5742. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5321. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

DOI:10.3892/etm.2017.5321
PMID:29285115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5740797/
Abstract

Ascites is among the most common complications of liver cirrhosis and is associated with a high mortality rate. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the potential correlation between in-hospital mortality of liver cirrhosis and volume of ascites. Patients with liver cirrhosis who were admitted to the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region (Shenyang, China) between June 2012 and June 2014 and underwent axial abdomino-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans were retrospectively reviewed. The volume of ascites was approximated using a five-point method, and diagnostic accuracy was expressed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of the 177 patients reviewed in the present study, 117 (61.10%) exhibited ascites on CT scans, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 4.52% (8/177). Child-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were significantly increased in the presence of ascites (P<0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate did not differ significantly between patients with and without ascites (P=0.052). In patients with ascites >300 ml (n=72), the AUROCs of the Child-Pugh score, MELD score, and ascites volume for predicting in-hospital mortality were 0.939 (95% CI, 0.856-0982), 0.952 (95% CI, 0.873-0.988), and 0.782 (95% CI, 0.668-0.871), respectively. These AUROCs did not differ significantly. In conclusion, quantification of ascites may aid to predict the in-hospital mortality rate of cirrhotic patients.

摘要

腹水是肝硬化最常见的并发症之一,且与高死亡率相关。本回顾性研究旨在评估肝硬化患者住院死亡率与腹水量之间的潜在相关性。对2012年6月至2014年6月间入住沈阳军区总医院(中国沈阳)并接受腹部盆腔轴向计算机断层扫描(CT)的肝硬化患者进行回顾性分析。采用五点法估算腹水量,并通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)及95%置信区间(CI)表示诊断准确性。本研究共纳入177例患者,其中117例(61.10%)CT扫描显示有腹水,住院死亡率为4.52%(8/177)。存在腹水时,Child-Pugh评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分显著升高(P<0.001)。有腹水和无腹水患者的住院死亡率差异无统计学意义(P=0.052)。在腹水>300 ml的患者(n=72)中,Child-Pugh评分、MELD评分及腹水量预测住院死亡率的AUROC分别为0.939(95%CI,0.856-0.982)、0.952(95%CI,0.873-0.988)和0.782(95%CI,0.668-0.871)。这些AUROC差异无统计学意义。总之,腹水定量可能有助于预测肝硬化患者的住院死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56d/5740797/2e89ba9294dd/etm-14-06-5733-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56d/5740797/5911ef75e95c/etm-14-06-5733-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56d/5740797/e2807d0629f0/etm-14-06-5733-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56d/5740797/2e89ba9294dd/etm-14-06-5733-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56d/5740797/5911ef75e95c/etm-14-06-5733-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56d/5740797/e2807d0629f0/etm-14-06-5733-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56d/5740797/2e89ba9294dd/etm-14-06-5733-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantification of ascites based on abdomino-pelvic computed tomography scans for predicting the in-hospital mortality of liver cirrhosis.基于腹盆腔计算机断层扫描对腹水进行量化以预测肝硬化患者的院内死亡率。
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Dec;14(6):5733-5742. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5321. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
2
Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores for predicting the in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.用于预测慢性肝衰竭急性发作的肝硬化患者院内死亡率的Child-Pugh、MELD和ALBI评分。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;10(8):971-80. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2016.1177788. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
Child-Pugh versus MELD score for predicting the in-hospital mortality of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in liver cirrhosis.比较Child-Pugh评分与终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分预测肝硬化急性上消化道出血患者院内死亡率的价值
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):751-7. eCollection 2015.
4
Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.肝硬化静脉曲张出血患者风险评分系统的预后价值。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 7;25(45):6668-6680. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i45.6668.
5
Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Troponin T-Hypersensitivity Levels Correlate With the Severity of Liver Dysfunction in Liver Cirrhosis.脑钠肽前体和肌钙蛋白T超敏水平与肝硬化患者肝功能障碍的严重程度相关。
Am J Med Sci. 2017 Aug;354(2):131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
6
D-dimer level for predicting the in-hospital mortality in liver cirrhosis: A retrospective study.D-二聚体水平预测肝硬化患者院内死亡率的回顾性研究。
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Jan;13(1):285-289. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3930. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
The model for the end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh score in predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal variceal bleeding.终末期肝病模型及Child-Pugh评分在预测肝硬化合并食管静脉曲张出血患者预后中的应用
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2009 Sep;66(9):724-8. doi: 10.2298/vsp0909724b.
8
[MELD score in prediction of early mortality in patients suffering refractory ascites treated by TIPS].[终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗的顽固性腹水患者早期死亡率的预测作用]
Vnitr Lek. 2006 Sep;52(9):771-6.
9
Predicting Mortality Across a Broad Spectrum of Liver Disease-An Assessment of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), and Creatinine-Modified CTP Scores.预测广泛肝病患者的死亡率——对终末期肝病模型(MELD)、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分以及肌酐修正CTP评分的评估
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2011 Dec;1(3):161-8. doi: 10.1016/S0973-6883(11)60233-8. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
10
Association of umbilical hernia with volume of ascites in liver cirrhosis: a retrospective observational study.脐疝与肝硬化腹水容量的关系:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Evid Based Med. 2016 Nov;9(4):170-180. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12225.

引用本文的文献

1
Amount of ascites impacts survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization advocating for volumetric assessment.腹水的量会影响接受经动脉化疗栓塞术的肝细胞癌患者的生存,这支持进行容积评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 17;14(1):16550. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67312-2.
2
Evaluating the Correlation Between Anteroposterior Diameter, Body Surface Area, and Height for Liver Transplant Donors and Recipients.评估肝移植供体和受体的前后径、体表面积与身高之间的相关性。
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 16;10(6):e1630. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001630. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Clinical and Radiological Parameters to Discriminate Tuberculous Peritonitis and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Patients with Cirrhosis.肝硬化患者的治疗
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):767-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1504367.
2
AISF-SIMTI Position Paper: The appropriate use of albumin in patients with liver cirrhosis.意大利肝脏研究和移植学会-意大利重症监护和移植学会立场文件:肝硬化患者白蛋白的合理使用
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jan;48(1):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.008.
3
Impact of hyponatremia on frequency of complications in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.低钠血症对失代偿期肝硬化患者并发症发生率的影响。
鉴别结核性腹膜炎和腹膜癌病的临床及影像学参数
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 13;13(20):3206. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203206.
4
Lymphatic drainage dysfunction via narrowing of the lumen of cisterna chyli and thoracic duct after luminal dilation.腔静脉裂孔和胸导管在管腔扩张后通过管腔狭窄导致淋巴引流功能障碍。
Hepatol Int. 2023 Dec;17(6):1557-1569. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10563-4. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Contrast-Enhanced CT May Be a Diagnostic Alternative for Gastroesophageal Varices in Cirrhosis with and without Previous Endoscopic Variceal Therapy.对比增强CT可能是肝硬化合并或不合并既往内镜下静脉曲张治疗的食管胃静脉曲张的一种诊断替代方法。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Oct 20;2019:6704673. doi: 10.1155/2019/6704673. eCollection 2019.
6
Current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites.当前肝硬化腹水患者管理方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 28;25(28):3738-3752. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3738.
7
Prognostic significance of the pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.上皮性卵巢癌患者治疗前预后营养指数的预后意义
Oncotarget. 2019 Jun 4;10(38):3605-3613. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26914.
8
Paracentesis Model for Junior Doctors.初级医生腹腔穿刺模型
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2018 Oct 2;12(3):89-92. doi: 10.1002/cld.734. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Electron Physician. 2015 Oct 19;7(6):1349-58. doi: 10.14661/1349. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
Evaluation and treatment of malignant ascites secondary to gastric cancer.胃癌继发恶性腹水的评估与治疗
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 21;21(39):10936-47. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i39.10936.
5
Management of cirrhotic ascites.肝硬化腹水的管理
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015 May;6(3):124-37. doi: 10.1177/2040622315580069.
6
Child-Pugh versus MELD score for predicting the in-hospital mortality of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in liver cirrhosis.比较Child-Pugh评分与终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分预测肝硬化急性上消化道出血患者院内死亡率的价值
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):751-7. eCollection 2015.
7
Predicting the amount of intraperitoneal fluid accumulation by computed tomography and its clinical use in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.通过计算机断层扫描预测消化性溃疡穿孔患者的腹腔内液体蓄积量及其临床应用
Int Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;99(6):824-9. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00109.1.
8
Albumin: pathophysiologic basis of its role in the treatment of cirrhosis and its complications.白蛋白:在肝硬化及其并发症治疗中其作用的病理生理学基础。
Hepatology. 2013 Nov;58(5):1836-46. doi: 10.1002/hep.26338. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Assessing clinical benefit response in the treatment of gastric malignant ascites with non-measurable lesions: a multicenter phase II trial of paclitaxel for malignant ascites secondary to advanced/recurrent gastric cancer.评估治疗不可测量病变的胃癌恶性腹水的临床获益反应:紫杉醇治疗晚期/复发性胃癌继发恶性腹水的多中心 II 期试验。
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Mar;14(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0016-6. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
10
EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis.欧洲肝脏研究学会肝硬化腹水、自发性细菌性腹膜炎和肝肾综合征管理临床实践指南
J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):397-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 1.