Wang Zhenxiao, Liu Yun, Wang Line, Shen Xixi, Han Shuguang, Wang Wei, Gao Fenqi, Liang Wenqi, Peng Kevin A
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;104:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
To explore the characteristics of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) in children with cochlear nerve canal stenosis (CNCs) following cochlear implantation (CI), and the EABR thresholds in children with stenotic versus normal cochlear nerve canals.
Sixteen children with profound sensorineural hearing loss were included in this study: 8 with CNCs (CNCs group) and 8 with normal cochlear nerve canals (control group). All children underwent cochlear implantation with full insertion of all electrodes. EABR was performed 6 months postoperatively in both groups.
The EABR extraction rate was 100% in children with normal cochlear nerve canals and only 50% in children with CNCs. EABR thresholds were significantly higher in children with CNCs of electrodes No. 11and 22 than in children with normal cochlear nerve canals (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). There was no significant difference in EABR thresholds among electrode No. 1, 11 and 22 in CNCs group (P > 0.05 for all comparisons); while in the control group, the EABR threshold at electrode No 22 was lower than those at both electrodes No. 11 and 1 (P < 0.05 for both comparisons), and the EABR threshold at electrode No. 11 was also lower than that at electrode No. 1 (P < 0.05).
The EABR thresholds in children with normal cochlear nerve canals vary according to the different locations of electrodes in the cochlea; while in children with CNCs, there was no significant difference among different electrode locations. The EABR thresholds in CNCs children were higher than those of children with normal cochlear nerve canals at electrode 11 and 22.
探讨人工耳蜗植入(CI)后蜗神经管狭窄(CNCs)儿童的电诱发听性脑干反应(EABR)特点,以及蜗神经管狭窄与正常儿童的EABR阈值情况。
本研究纳入16例重度感音神经性听力损失儿童:8例蜗神经管狭窄患儿(CNCs组)和8例蜗神经管正常患儿(对照组)。所有儿童均接受人工耳蜗植入且所有电极完全植入。两组均在术后6个月进行EABR检测。
蜗神经管正常儿童的EABR引出率为100%,而蜗神经管狭窄儿童仅为50%。蜗神经管狭窄儿童电极11和22处的EABR阈值显著高于蜗神经管正常儿童(两项比较P均<0.05)。CNCs组电极1、11和22处的EABR阈值差异无统计学意义(所有比较P>0.05);而在对照组中,电极22处的EABR阈值低于电极11和1处(两项比较P均<0.05),电极11处的EABR阈值也低于电极1处(P<0.05)。
蜗神经管正常儿童的EABR阈值随耳蜗内电极位置不同而变化;而蜗神经管狭窄儿童不同电极位置之间无显著差异。蜗神经管狭窄儿童电极11和22处的EABR阈值高于蜗神经管正常儿童。