Suppr超能文献

接受人工耳蜗植入的蜗神经管狭窄患者电诱发听觉脑干反应的特征

Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants.

作者信息

Wang Zhenxiao, Liu Yun, Wang Line, Shen Xixi, Han Shuguang, Wang Wei, Gao Fenqi, Liang Wenqi, Peng Kevin A

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;104:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the characteristics of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) in children with cochlear nerve canal stenosis (CNCs) following cochlear implantation (CI), and the EABR thresholds in children with stenotic versus normal cochlear nerve canals.

METHOD

Sixteen children with profound sensorineural hearing loss were included in this study: 8 with CNCs (CNCs group) and 8 with normal cochlear nerve canals (control group). All children underwent cochlear implantation with full insertion of all electrodes. EABR was performed 6 months postoperatively in both groups.

RESULTS

The EABR extraction rate was 100% in children with normal cochlear nerve canals and only 50% in children with CNCs. EABR thresholds were significantly higher in children with CNCs of electrodes No. 11and 22 than in children with normal cochlear nerve canals (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). There was no significant difference in EABR thresholds among electrode No. 1, 11 and 22 in CNCs group (P > 0.05 for all comparisons); while in the control group, the EABR threshold at electrode No 22 was lower than those at both electrodes No. 11 and 1 (P < 0.05 for both comparisons), and the EABR threshold at electrode No. 11 was also lower than that at electrode No. 1 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The EABR thresholds in children with normal cochlear nerve canals vary according to the different locations of electrodes in the cochlea; while in children with CNCs, there was no significant difference among different electrode locations. The EABR thresholds in CNCs children were higher than those of children with normal cochlear nerve canals at electrode 11 and 22.

摘要

目的

探讨人工耳蜗植入(CI)后蜗神经管狭窄(CNCs)儿童的电诱发听性脑干反应(EABR)特点,以及蜗神经管狭窄与正常儿童的EABR阈值情况。

方法

本研究纳入16例重度感音神经性听力损失儿童:8例蜗神经管狭窄患儿(CNCs组)和8例蜗神经管正常患儿(对照组)。所有儿童均接受人工耳蜗植入且所有电极完全植入。两组均在术后6个月进行EABR检测。

结果

蜗神经管正常儿童的EABR引出率为100%,而蜗神经管狭窄儿童仅为50%。蜗神经管狭窄儿童电极11和22处的EABR阈值显著高于蜗神经管正常儿童(两项比较P均<0.05)。CNCs组电极1、11和22处的EABR阈值差异无统计学意义(所有比较P>0.05);而在对照组中,电极22处的EABR阈值低于电极11和1处(两项比较P均<0.05),电极11处的EABR阈值也低于电极1处(P<0.05)。

结论

蜗神经管正常儿童的EABR阈值随耳蜗内电极位置不同而变化;而蜗神经管狭窄儿童不同电极位置之间无显著差异。蜗神经管狭窄儿童电极11和22处的EABR阈值高于蜗神经管正常儿童。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验