Suppr超能文献

系统评价当前使用评估指南研究与评价 II 工具进行的指南评估——三分之一的 AGREE II 用户为指南质量设定了截止值。

Systematic review of current guideline appraisals performed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument-a third of AGREE II users apply a cut-off for guideline quality.

机构信息

Department Healthcare and Health Economy, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Health, Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Campus Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department Healthcare and Health Economy, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;95:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II users apply a cut-off based on standardized domain scores or overall guideline quality to distinguish between high- and low-quality guidelines, as well as to investigate which criteria they use to generate this cut-off and which type of cut-off they apply.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE, and the HTA-database for German- and English-language studies appraising guidelines with AGREE II. Information on cut-offs was extracted and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

We identified 118 relevant publications. Thirty-nine (33%) used a cut-off, of which 24 (62%) used a 2-step and 13 (33%) used a 3-step approach. The cut-off for high quality lay between 50% and 70% (2-step) and 60% and 83% (3-step) of the highest possible rating. Twenty-four (62%) publications applied a cut-off based on standardized domain scores and 7 (18%) based on overall guideline quality. Eleven (28%) applied cut-offs to derive the recommendation for guideline use.

CONCLUSION

A third of AGREE II users apply a cut-off to distinguish between high- and low-quality guidelines, often without clearly describing how the cut-off is generated. Many users might welcome a clear distinction between high- and low-quality guidelines; specifying a cut-off for this purpose might be useful.

摘要

目的

调查 Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation(AGREE)II 用户是否基于标准化领域评分或整体指南质量应用截止值来区分高质量和低质量指南,以及调查他们使用哪些标准来生成此截止值以及应用哪种类型的截止值。

研究设计和设置

我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、DARE 和德国和英语评估指南的 HTA-database 中进行了系统搜索。提取并描述性分析了有关截止值的信息。

结果

我们确定了 118 篇相关出版物。其中 39 篇(33%)使用了截止值,其中 24 篇(62%)使用了 2 步截止值,13 篇(33%)使用了 3 步截止值。高质量的截止值介于最高评分的 50%至 70%(2 步)和 60%至 83%(3 步)之间。24 篇(62%)出版物基于标准化领域评分,7 篇(18%)基于整体指南质量应用截止值。11 篇(28%)应用截止值来得出指南使用建议。

结论

三分之一的 AGREE II 用户应用截止值来区分高质量和低质量指南,通常没有明确描述如何生成截止值。许多用户可能欢迎明确区分高质量和低质量指南;为此指定截止值可能会很有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验