Bartrim Karly, Pashley Alice, Wheeler Mikaela, Chen Lily, Sossen Lisa, Hancock Tracy, Cave Danielle
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Centre for Ageing Research and Translation, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70083. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70083.
This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesise existing publicly available tools that support menu assessments for residential aged care settings, specifically the tools content areas, recommendations and quality. The scoping review was conducted according to Levac et al. scoping review methodology and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Menu assessment tools were identified through grey literature through Google and Google Scholar search engines using key terms such as 'residential aged care' and 'menu assessment'. Data were synthesised and reported narratively, according to content areas of menu planning, nutritional basis of the menu, texture modification/fluid consistency, therapeutic and special diets and foodservice management recommendations. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation Instrument. Seventeen tools from seven countries were included. There was variability in the content and recommendations, with no included tool covering all content areas. The overall quality ranged from two to six (out of seven), and no tools met the quality criteria to be recommended for use in their current form. The lack of consistency in content areas, recommendations and quality of tools indicates the need to modify existing tools or to conduct research to support the development of a new evidence-based tool. Future research is needed to gain consensus on acceptable content areas, appropriate recommendations and to develop an evidence-base to underpin the tools. A purpose-built, evidence-based tool is essential for consistent foodservice evaluation and for improving food and nutrition standards, ultimately enhancing resident outcomes.
本综述旨在识别并综合现有的公开可用工具,这些工具可支持对老年护理机构的菜单进行评估,特别是工具的内容领域、建议和质量。本综述按照莱瓦克等人的综述方法进行,并根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目扩展版进行报告。通过谷歌和谷歌学术搜索引擎,使用“老年护理机构”和“菜单评估”等关键词,从灰色文献中识别菜单评估工具。根据菜单规划的内容领域、菜单的营养基础、质地改良/液体稠度、治疗性和特殊饮食以及餐饮服务管理建议,对数据进行综合并以叙述方式报告。使用《研究与评价指南评估工具》进行质量评估。纳入了来自七个国家的17种工具。内容和建议存在差异,没有一个纳入的工具涵盖所有内容领域。总体质量在2至6分(满分7分)之间,没有工具符合以当前形式推荐使用的质量标准。工具在内容领域、建议和质量方面缺乏一致性,这表明需要修改现有工具或开展研究以支持开发新的循证工具。未来需要开展研究,就可接受的内容领域、适当的建议达成共识,并建立支撑这些工具的证据基础。一个专门构建的循证工具对于一致的餐饮服务评估以及提高食品和营养标准至关重要,最终可改善居民的结局。