• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于静脉注射苯妥英钠治疗癫痫持续状态的随机对照试验的批判性评价。

A critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials on intravenous phenytoin in convulsive status epilepticus.

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona.

Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2018 Mar;25(3):451-463. doi: 10.1111/ene.13560. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/ene.13560
PMID:29288520
Abstract

Since the 1970s, intravenous (IV) phenytoin (PHT) has traditionally been used as second-stage treatment for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) after failure of benzodiazepines. The aim of this review was to critically assess the evidence supporting the use of IV PHT as treatment of convulsive SE in patients of any age. In particular, we critically appraised the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating IV PHT as treatment of convulsive SE. A systematic search of the literature was carried out to identify RCTs evaluating IV PHT as treatment of convulsive SE in patients of any age. Eight RCTs (544 patients allocated to IV PHT) were included. The included studies differed in almost every single characteristic considered. Six RCTs (472 patients) used IV PHT without demonstrating refractoriness of SE to benzodiazepines. Only two RCTs (72 patients) used IV PHT as second-line treatment for benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive SE. Overall, most evidence from RCTs supports the use of IV PHT immediately after IV diazepam, even if seizures have not recurred. The recommendation derived from RCTs supporting the use of IV PHT as second-line treatment in benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive SE is weak. This is emblematic of the lack of robust evidence from large RCTs to inform clinical practice on how to treat SE after failure of first-line drugs. IV PHT given immediately after first-line benzodiazepines could prolong their short antiepileptic effect and prevent seizure recurrence.

摘要

自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,静脉注射苯妥英钠(PHT)一直是苯二氮䓬类药物治疗失败后治疗惊厥性癫痫持续状态(SE)的二线治疗方法。本综述的目的是批判性评估支持将静脉注射 PHT 作为任何年龄段患者治疗惊厥性 SE 的证据。特别是,我们批判性评估了评估静脉注射 PHT 作为惊厥性 SE 治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)的结果。进行了系统的文献搜索,以确定评估任何年龄段患者静脉注射 PHT 作为惊厥性 SE 治疗的 RCT。纳入了 8 项 RCT(544 例患者接受静脉注射 PHT 治疗)。纳入的研究在几乎每个考虑的特征上都存在差异。6 项 RCT(472 例患者)在未证明 SE 对苯二氮䓬类药物耐药的情况下使用了静脉注射 PHT。只有 2 项 RCT(72 例患者)将静脉注射 PHT 作为苯二氮䓬类药物耐药性惊厥性 SE 的二线治疗。总体而言,大多数 RCT 证据支持在静脉注射地西泮后立即使用静脉注射 PHT,即使癫痫未再次发作。支持将静脉注射 PHT 作为苯二氮䓬类药物耐药性惊厥性 SE 的二线治疗的 RCT 得出的建议是薄弱的。这表明缺乏来自大型 RCT 的强有力证据来指导如何治疗一线药物治疗失败后的 SE。在一线苯二氮䓬类药物后立即给予静脉注射 PHT 可能会延长其短暂的抗癫痫作用并预防癫痫发作复发。

相似文献

1
A critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials on intravenous phenytoin in convulsive status epilepticus.关于静脉注射苯妥英钠治疗癫痫持续状态的随机对照试验的批判性评价。
Eur J Neurol. 2018 Mar;25(3):451-463. doi: 10.1111/ene.13560. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
2
Is intravenous lorazepam really more effective and safe than intravenous diazepam as first-line treatment for convulsive status epilepticus? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.作为惊厥性癫痫持续状态的一线治疗,静脉注射劳拉西泮真的比静脉注射地西泮更有效且更安全吗?一项对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析的系统评价。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Nov;64(Pt A):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
Levetiracetam as an alternative to phenytoin for second-line emergency treatment of children with convulsive status epilepticus: the EcLiPSE RCT.左乙拉西坦作为苯妥英钠的替代药物,用于惊厥性癫痫持续状态儿童的二线急救治疗:EcLiPSE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(58):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta24580.
4
Intravenous antiepileptic drugs in adults with benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive status epilepticus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人苯二氮䓬类耐药性惊厥性癫痫持续状态的静脉用抗癫痫药物:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Dec;101(Pt B):106466. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106466. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
5
Direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis of levetiracetam versus phenytoin or valproate for convulsive status epilepticus.左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠或丙戊酸盐治疗惊厥性癫痫持续状态的直接和间接比较荟萃分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Nov;64(Pt A):110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam vs. Phenytoin as Second Line Antiseizure Medication for Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠治疗儿童惊厥性癫痫持续状态的二线抗癫痫药物疗效和安全性的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 May 17;67(2). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab014.
7
IV Valproate in generalized convulsive status epilepticus: a systematic review.静脉用丙戊酸钠治疗全面性惊厥性癫痫持续状态的系统评价。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Sep;19(9):1180-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03606.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
8
Pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in adults: an evidence synthesis.成人惊厥性癫痫持续状态的院前和急诊处理:证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Mar;26(20):1-76. doi: 10.3310/RSVK2062.
9
Why we prefer levetiracetam over phenytoin for treatment of status epilepticus.为何我们更倾向于使用左乙拉西坦而非苯妥英钠治疗癫痫持续状态。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Jun;137(6):618-622. doi: 10.1111/ane.12928. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Levetiracetam versus phenytoin in management of status epilepticus.左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠治疗癫痫持续状态的对比研究
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jun;22(6):959-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.12.013. Epub 2015 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line medications for status epilepticus: A network meta-analysis.二线药物治疗癫痫持续状态的疗效和安全性比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 15;103(46):e40333. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040333.
2
[Paediatric status epilepticus].[小儿癫痫持续状态]
Rev Neurol. 2022 Oct 16;75(8):225-238. doi: 10.33588/rn.7508.2022196.
3
[Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam versus phenytoin as second-line drugs for the treatment of children with convulsive status epilepticus: a Meta analysis].
左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠作为治疗儿童惊厥性癫痫持续状态二线药物的疗效及安全性:一项Meta分析
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Apr;23(4):356-362. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2010066.
4
Treatments for Convulsive and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: An Expert Opinion Survey in South Korea.成人惊厥性和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的治疗:韩国的一项专家意见调查
J Clin Neurol. 2021 Jan;17(1):20-25. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2021.17.1.20.
5
Clinical outcomes and treatments effectiveness in status epilepticus resolved by antiepileptic drugs: A five-year observational study.抗癫痫药物治疗癫痫持续状态的临床结局及治疗效果:一项为期五年的观察性研究。
Epilepsia Open. 2020 Mar 2;5(2):166-175. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12383. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
Intravenous Brivaracetam in the Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review.静脉注射布瓦西坦治疗癫痫持续状态的系统评价。
CNS Drugs. 2019 Aug;33(8):771-781. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00652-0.