Suppr超能文献

为何我们更倾向于使用左乙拉西坦而非苯妥英钠治疗癫痫持续状态。

Why we prefer levetiracetam over phenytoin for treatment of status epilepticus.

机构信息

Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Usl centro Toscana Health Authority, Firenze, Italy.

Neurology Unit, Azienda Ospedialiero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Jun;137(6):618-622. doi: 10.1111/ane.12928. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Abstract

Over last fifty years, intravenous (iv) phenytoin (PHT) loading dose has been the treatment of choice for patients with benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive status epilepticus and several guidelines recommended this treatment regimen with simultaneous iv diazepam. Clinical studies have never shown a better efficacy of PHT over other antiepileptic drugs. In addition, iv PHT loading dose is a complex and time-consuming procedure which may expose patients to several risks, such as local cutaneous reactions (purple glove syndrome), severe hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias up to ventricular fibrillation and death, and increased risk of severe allergic reactions. A further disadvantage of PHT is that it is a strong enzymatic inducer and it may make ineffective several drugs that need to be used simultaneously with antiepileptic treatment. In patients with a benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus, we suggest iv administration of levetiracetam as soon as possible. If levetiracetam would be ineffective, a further antiepileptic drug among those currently available for iv use (valproate, lacosamide, or phenytoin) can be added before starting third line treatment.

摘要

在过去的五十年中,静脉注射苯妥英钠(PHT)负荷剂量一直是治疗苯二氮䓬类药物耐药性惊厥性癫痫持续状态的首选方法,并且有几项指南建议同时使用静脉注射地西泮进行这种治疗方案。临床研究从未表明 PHT 比其他抗癫痫药物更有效。此外,静脉注射 PHT 负荷剂量是一个复杂且耗时的过程,可能会使患者面临多种风险,例如局部皮肤反应(紫手套综合征)、严重低血压和心律失常,甚至室颤和死亡,以及严重过敏反应的风险增加。PHT 的另一个缺点是它是一种强酶诱导剂,可能会使同时需要用于抗癫痫治疗的几种药物无效。对于苯二氮䓬类药物耐药性癫痫持续状态的患者,我们建议尽快静脉注射左乙拉西坦。如果左乙拉西坦无效,可以在开始三线治疗之前添加目前可用于静脉注射的另一种抗癫痫药物(丙戊酸钠、拉科酰胺或苯妥英钠)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验