Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌伴肝内和肝外转移灶的切除——是一项值得开展的手术吗?

Resection of Concomitant Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer - A Worthwhile Operation?

作者信息

Diaconescu Andrei, Alexandrescu Sorin, Ionel Zenaida, Zlate Cristian, Grigorie Razvan, Brasoveanu Vladislav, Hrehoret Doina, Ciurea Silviu, Botea Florin, Tomescu Dana, Droc Gabriela, Croitoru Adina, Herlea Vlad, Boros Mirela, Grasu Mugur, Dumitru Radu, Toma Mihai, Ionescu Mihnea, Vasilescu Catalin, Popescu Irinel

出版信息

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Nov-Dec;112(6):673-682. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.6.673.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The benefit of hepatic resection in case of concomitant colorectal hepatic and extrahepatic metastases (CHEHMs) is still debatable. The purpose of this study is to assess the results of resection of hepatic and extrahepatic metastases in patients with CHEHMs in a high-volume center for both hepatobiliary and colorectal surgery and to identify prognostic factors that correlate with longer survival in these patients.

METHOD

It was performed a retrospective analysis of 678 consecutive patients with liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases operated in a single Centre between April 1996 and March 2016. Among these, 73 patients presented CHEHMs. Univariate analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for overall survival (OS) in these patients. There were 20 CHMs located at the lymphatic node level, 20 at the peritoneal level, 12 at the ovary and lung level, 12 presenting as local relapses and 9 other sites. 53 curative resections (R0) were performed. The difference in overall survival between the CHEHMs group and the CHMs group is statistically significant for the entire groups (p 0.0001), as well as in patients who underwent R0 resection (p 0.0001). In CHEHMs group, the OS was statistically significant higher in patients who underwent R0 resection vs. those with R1/R2 resection (p=0.004). Three variables were identified as prognostic factors for poor OS following univariate analysis: 4 or more hepatic metastases, major hepatectomy and the performance of operation during first period of the study (1996 - 2004). There was a tendency toward better OS in patients with ovarian or pulmonary location of extrahepatic disease, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In patients with concomitant hepatic and extrahepatic metastases, complete resection of metastatic burden significantly prolong survival. The patients with up to 4 liver metastases, resectable by minor hepatectomy benefit the most from this aggressive onco-surgical management.

摘要

未标注

对于同时存在结直肠癌肝转移和肝外转移(CHEHMs)的患者,肝切除的益处仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估在一家肝胆和结直肠手术量大的中心,对CHEHMs患者进行肝转移和肝外转移切除的结果,并确定与这些患者更长生存期相关的预后因素。

方法

对1996年4月至2016年3月期间在单一中心接受结直肠癌肝转移肝切除的678例连续患者进行回顾性分析。其中,73例患者存在CHEHMs。进行单因素分析以确定这些患者总生存期(OS)的危险因素。有20例CHMs位于淋巴结水平,20例位于腹膜水平,12例位于卵巢和肺水平,12例表现为局部复发,9例位于其他部位。进行了53例根治性切除(R0)。CHEHMs组和CHMs组之间的总生存期差异在整个组中具有统计学意义(p = 0.0001),在接受R0切除的患者中也是如此(p = 0.0001)。在CHEHMs组中,接受R0切除的患者的OS明显高于接受R1/R2切除的患者(p = 0.004)。单因素分析确定了三个与OS不良相关的预后因素:4个或更多肝转移、肝大部切除以及在研究的第一阶段(1996 - 2004年)进行手术。肝外疾病位于卵巢或肺部的患者有OS改善的趋势,尽管差异无统计学意义。

结论

对于同时存在肝转移和肝外转移的患者,完全切除转移灶可显著延长生存期。肝转移灶数量最多为4个、可通过肝部分切除术切除的患者从这种积极的肿瘤外科治疗中获益最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验