Suppr超能文献

电子健康干预措施在促进老年人身体活动中的有效性:系统评价。

Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for the promotion of physical activity in older adults: A systematic review.

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.

Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2018 Mar;108:93-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

Abstract

Regular physical activity (PA) is central to healthy ageing. However, only a minority of older adults currently meet the WHO-recommended PA levels. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the effectiveness of eHealth interventions promoting PA in older adults aged 55years and above with either no intervention or a non-eHealth intervention (review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015023875). Eight electronic databases were searched to identify experimental and quasi-experimental studies examining the effectiveness of eHealth interventions for PA promotion in adults aged 55years and above. Two authors independently selected and reviewed references, extracted data, and assessed study quality. In the search, 5771 records were retrieved, 20 studies met all inclusion criteria. Studies varied greatly in intervention mode, content, duration and assessed outcomes. Study quality ranged from poor to moderate. All interventions comprised tailored PA advice and the majority of interventions included goal setting and feedback, as well as PA tracking. Participation in eHealth interventions to promote PA led to increased levels of PA in adults aged 55years and above when compared to no intervention control groups, at least in the short term. However, the results were inconclusive regarding the question of whether eHealth interventions have a greater impact on PA behavior among older adults than non-eHealth interventions (e.g., print interventions). eHealth interventions can effectively promote PA in older adults aged 55years and above in the short-term, while evidence regarding long-term effects and the added benefit of eHealth compared to non-eHealth intervention components is still lacking.

摘要

定期进行身体活动(PA)是健康老龄化的核心。然而,目前只有少数老年人达到世界卫生组织推荐的 PA 水平。本系统评价的目的是比较电子健康干预措施在促进 55 岁及以上老年人 PA 方面的有效性,这些干预措施与无干预或非电子健康干预措施相比(审查注册:PROSPERO CRD42015023875)。八个电子数据库被用来寻找实验和准实验研究,这些研究检查了电子健康干预措施在促进 55 岁及以上成年人 PA 方面的有效性。两名作者独立选择和审查参考文献、提取数据和评估研究质量。在搜索中,共检索到 5771 条记录,20 项研究符合所有纳入标准。研究在干预模式、内容、持续时间和评估结果方面差异很大。研究质量从差到中等不等。所有的干预措施都包括有针对性的 PA 建议,大多数干预措施都包括目标设定和反馈,以及 PA 跟踪。与无干预对照组相比,参加电子健康干预措施以促进 PA 可以增加 55 岁及以上成年人的 PA 水平,至少在短期内是如此。然而,关于电子健康干预措施是否比非电子健康干预措施(如印刷干预措施)对老年人的 PA 行为有更大影响的问题,结果尚无定论。电子健康干预措施可以在短期内有效地促进 55 岁及以上老年人的 PA,而关于长期效果以及与非电子健康干预措施相比电子健康干预措施的附加益处的证据仍然缺乏。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验