Sridharan Kannan, Sivaramakrishnan Gowri
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Department of Oral Health, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Open Ophthalmol J. 2017 Nov 22;11:346-354. doi: 10.2174/1874364101711010346. eCollection 2017.
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) is a common, often overlooked, chronic condition affecting eyes for which various therapies are being evaluated. Considering the absence of a systematic review and meta-analysis, the present review was carried out.
An appropriate search strategy eligibility criteria were framed and electronic databases were scrutinized for appropriate literature. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) enrolling patients diagnosed with MGD were included. Outcome measures were Tear Break Up Time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, Meibomian Gland (MG) secretion score, MG plugging score, OSDI and SPEED. Cochrane's tool was used to assess the risk of bias and Forest plot were generated either with fixed or random effects model, with Standardized Mean Difference (SMD).
TBUTs, Schirmer's test and OSDI scores for systemic antimicrobials with placebo were 1.58 [1.33, 1.83], 2.93 [0.78, 5.09] and -3.58 [-4.28, -2.89] respectively. No quantitative synthesis was attempted for either mebiomian plugging or meibomian secretion scores and no significant changes were observed with any other outcome parameter.
Only the systemic antimicrobials were found to improve the clinical features of meibomian gland dysfunction. Varying effects of different therapeutic agents (heat therapies, omega-3-fatty acids and castor oil) were identified for MGD but the risk of bias pertaining to randomization and allocation concealment was found to be associated with most of the current RCTs. More high quality evidence is required to confirm the findings of the present review.
睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)是一种常见的、常被忽视的慢性眼部疾病,目前正在对其进行各种治疗评估。鉴于缺乏系统评价和荟萃分析,开展了本综述。
制定了适当的检索策略和纳入标准,并对电子数据库进行了审查以查找相关文献。纳入诊断为MGD的患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。观察指标为泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、泪液分泌试验、睑板腺(MG)分泌评分、MG堵塞评分、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)和干眼症状及体征评估量表(SPEED)。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险,并采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型生成森林图,计算标准化均数差(SMD)。
全身用抗菌药物与安慰剂相比,TBUT、泪液分泌试验和OSDI评分分别为1.58 [1.33, 1.83]、2.93 [0.78, 5.09]和-3.58 [-4.28, -2.89]。未对睑板腺堵塞或睑板腺分泌评分进行定量综合分析,其他观察指标也未观察到显著变化。
仅发现全身用抗菌药物可改善睑板腺功能障碍的临床特征。已确定不同治疗药物(热疗法、ω-3脂肪酸和蓖麻油)对MGD有不同效果,但发现大多数当前RCT在随机化和分配隐藏方面存在偏倚风险。需要更多高质量证据来证实本综述的结果。