• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intense pulsed light for the treatment of Meibomian gland dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Aug;20(2):1815-1821. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8838. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
2
Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction.强脉冲光(IPL)疗法治疗睑板腺功能障碍。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 18;3(3):CD013559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013559.
3
Intense pulsed light for meibomian gland dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;259(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04834-1. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
4
Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related dry eye disease (DED): a systematic review and meta-analysis.强脉冲光(IPL)治疗睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)相关干眼(DED):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 19;38(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03690-1.
5
Effect of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy in Dry Eye Disease Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.强脉冲光疗法治疗睑板腺功能障碍引起的干眼的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):424-429. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000934. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Intense pulsed light therapy with meibomian gland expression for dry eye disease.强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍相关性干眼。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;55(3):189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.11.009. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: A meta-analysis and systematic review.强脉冲光疗法治疗干眼疾病的体征和症状的疗效:Meta 分析和系统评价。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;71(4):1316-1325. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2987_22.
8
Intense pulsed light plus meibomian gland expression versus intense pulsed light alone for meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomized crossover study.强脉冲光联合睑板腺按摩与单纯强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍的随机交叉研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0246245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246245. eCollection 2021.
9
Therapeutic efficacy of intense pulsed light in patients with refractory meibomian gland dysfunction.强脉冲光治疗难治性睑板腺功能障碍的疗效。
Ocul Surf. 2019 Jan;17(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial.经导管睑板腺探通术联合强脉冲光治疗难治性阻塞性睑板腺功能障碍的临床疗效:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1219-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Quintessence of currently approved and upcoming treatments for dry eye disease.目前已获批及即将上市的干眼症治疗方法的精髓。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;263(2):269-278. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06587-7. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Comparison of clinical outcomes between intense pulsed light therapy using two different filters in meibomian gland dysfunction: prospective randomized study.两种不同滤光片强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍的临床疗效比较:前瞻性随机研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 24;13(1):6700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33526-z.
3
Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related dry eye disease (DED): a systematic review and meta-analysis.强脉冲光(IPL)治疗睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)相关干眼(DED):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 19;38(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03690-1.
4
Efficacy of hyaluronic acid 0.3%, cyanocobalamin, electrolytes, and P-Plus in menopause patients with moderate dry eye disease.0.3%透明质酸、氰钴胺、电解质和 P-Plus 治疗绝经后中度干眼患者的疗效。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;260(2):529-535. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05415-6. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
[Intense pulsed light (IPL) as a therapeutic option for Meibomian gland dysfunction].[强脉冲光(IPL)作为睑板腺功能障碍的一种治疗选择]
Ophthalmologe. 2019 Oct;116(10):982-988. doi: 10.1007/s00347-019-00955-z.
2
NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT.使用手持式脂质层检查仪器进行非侵入性泪膜破裂时间评估
Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Mar;58(1):63-71. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.09.
3
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light Treatment with Meibomian Gland Expression of the Upper Eyelids for Dry Eye Disease.强脉冲光联合睑板腺按摩治疗上睑干眼症的安全性和有效性评估
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 Sep;37(9):527-531. doi: 10.1089/photob.2018.4599. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
Intense regulated pulse light for the meibomian gland dysfunction.强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;30(2):289-292. doi: 10.1177/1120672118817687. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Therapeutic efficacy of intense pulsed light in patients with refractory meibomian gland dysfunction.强脉冲光治疗难治性睑板腺功能障碍的疗效。
Ocul Surf. 2019 Jan;17(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Long-Term Effects of Intense Pulsed Light Combined with Meibomian Gland Expression in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.强脉冲光联合睑板腺按摩治疗睑板腺功能障碍的长期效果
Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Oct;36(10):562-567. doi: 10.1089/pho.2018.4499. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
7
Multicenter Study of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Patients With Refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.难治性睑板腺功能障碍患者强脉冲光治疗的多中心研究
Cornea. 2018 Dec;37(12):1566-1571. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001687.
8
Long-term effects of intense pulsed light treatment on the ocular surface in patients with rosacea-associated meibomian gland dysfunction.强脉冲光治疗对酒渣鼻相关睑板腺功能障碍患者眼表的长期影响。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Oct;41(5):430-435. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
Intense Pulsed Light Applied Directly on Eyelids Combined with Meibomian Gland Expression to Treat Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.强脉冲光直接照射眼睑联合睑板腺按摩治疗睑板腺功能障碍
Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Jun;36(6):326-332. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4402. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
10
Changes in the Meibomian Gland After Exposure to Intense Pulsed Light in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) Patients.睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)患者暴露于强脉冲光后睑板腺的变化。
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Mar;43(3):308-313. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1406525. Epub 2017 Dec 4.

强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Intense pulsed light for the treatment of Meibomian gland dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Liu Shuang, Tang Shaohua, Dong Hong, Huang Xiaohan

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, P.R. China.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2020 Aug;20(2):1815-1821. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8838. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

DOI:10.3892/etm.2020.8838
PMID:32765683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7388499/
Abstract

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is frequently encountered by eye care practitioners. It is characterised by obstruction of the Meibomian glands and/or alterations in the consistency of glandular secretions. At present, no definitive treatment exists for this condition. The present meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in the management of MGD. Databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify clinical trials that assessed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of MGD. Outcome measures were described as the standardized mean difference (SMD). The fixed- or random-effects model was selected for analysis based on the Cochrane I values representing heterogeneity. Publication bias was visually inspected using Begg's funnel plot. Data were synthesized from four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 122 subjects in the IPL group and 120 subjects in the control group. Pooled analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores between the two groups [SMD -0.16 (95% CI, -0.41 to 0.10)] but a significant increase in Non-Invasive Tear Break-Up Time (NIBUT) scores in the IPL group (SMD, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.40-1.40). To conclude, the results of the present study did not provide any conclusive evidence for the efficacy of IPL therapy in the management of MGD. The analysis indicated that IPL therapy may result in an improvement of objective NIBUT scores but has no effect on subjective SPEED scores. Given the limited number of studies performed to date, there is a requirement for more well-designed prospective RCTs with a larger sample size to provide further evidence on the efficacy of IPL therapy.

摘要

睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)是眼科护理从业者经常遇到的问题。其特征是睑板腺阻塞和/或腺分泌物稠度改变。目前,针对这种情况尚无确切的治疗方法。进行本次荟萃分析是为了评估强脉冲光(IPL)疗法在治疗MGD中的疗效。系统检索了包括EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane中心、MEDLINE和谷歌学术在内的数据库,以确定评估IPL治疗MGD疗效的临床试验。结果指标用标准化均数差(SMD)表示。根据代表异质性的Cochrane I值选择固定效应模型或随机效应模型进行分析。使用Begg漏斗图直观检查发表偏倚。数据来自四项随机对照试验(RCT),IPL组有122名受试者,对照组有120名受试者。汇总分析表明,两组之间在干眼标准患者评估(SPEED)评分上无统计学显著差异[SMD -0.16(95%CI,-0.41至0.10)],但IPL组的非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)评分显著增加(SMD,0.90;95%CI,0.40 - 1.40)。总之,本研究结果未提供任何确凿证据证明IPL疗法在治疗MGD方面的疗效。分析表明,IPL疗法可能会改善客观的NIBUT评分,但对主观的SPEED评分没有影响。鉴于迄今为止进行的研究数量有限,需要更多设计良好、样本量更大的前瞻性RCT,以提供关于IPL疗法疗效的进一步证据。