Shadnia Shahin, Zamani Nasim, Hassanian-Moghaddam Hossein, Shafaroodi Hamed, Padandar Mina, Rezaeizadeh Mohammad Hasan
Toxicological Research Center, Department of Clinical Toxicology, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Excellence Center of Clinical Toxicology, Iranian Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran.
World J Emerg Med. 2018;9(1):51-55. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.01.008.
Prognostic value of cortisol and thyroid function tests (TFTs) has previously been evaluated in medical ICUs. We aimed to evaluate prognostic efficacy of cortisol and TFTs in critically ill poisoned patients admitted to toxicology intensive care unit (ICU).
In a prospective study of consecutively enrolled subjects admitted to the toxicology ICU, lab analyses included TFTs (total T3 and T4 as well as TSH) and cortisol levels drawn between 8 am-10 am during period of the first 24 hours post-ingestion/exposure. Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) were recorded. All scores were compared to detect the best prognostic factor. Type of poisoning was also included.
In 200 patients evaluated, 129 were male and mean age was 31 years. In general, SAPS II, T4, and cortisol could prognosticate death. After regression analysis, only cortisol had such efficacy (=0.04; =1.06; 95%=1.05-1.08; cut-off=42 µg/dL; sensitivity=70%; specificity=82%). Between aluminium phosphide (ALP)- and non ALP-poisoned patients, level of consciousness, mean arterial pressure, and cortisol level could prognosticate death in ALP poisoning (all <0.001 in both uni and multivariate analyses). Median (interquartile range; IQR) GCS was 7 (6, 10) and 15 (8, 15) in non-ALP and ALP-poisoned patients (<0.003). SAPS II and APACHE II could not prognosticate death at all.
Cortisol best prognosticated outcomes for subjects admitted to the toxicology ICU. Its level is higher in ALP-poisoned patients probably due to the higher stress while they remain conscious till the final stages of toxicity and are aware of deterioration of their clinical condition or may be due to their significantly lower blood pressures.
此前已在医学重症监护病房评估了皮质醇和甲状腺功能测试(TFTs)的预后价值。我们旨在评估皮质醇和TFTs在入住毒理学重症监护病房(ICU)的重症中毒患者中的预后疗效。
在一项对连续纳入的入住毒理学ICU的受试者进行的前瞻性研究中,实验室分析包括TFTs(总T3、T4以及促甲状腺激素)和摄入/接触后最初24小时内上午8点至10点测得的皮质醇水平。记录简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)。比较所有评分以检测最佳预后因素。还纳入了中毒类型。
在评估的200例患者中,129例为男性,平均年龄为31岁。总体而言,SAPS II、T4和皮质醇可以预测死亡。经过回归分析,只有皮质醇具有这种疗效(=0.04;=1.06;95%=1.05 - 1.08;临界值=42μg/dL;敏感性=70%;特异性=82%)。在磷化铝(ALP)中毒和非ALP中毒患者之间,意识水平、平均动脉压和皮质醇水平可以预测ALP中毒患者的死亡(单因素和多因素分析中均<0.001)。非ALP中毒和ALP中毒患者的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)中位数(四分位间距;IQR)分别为7(6,10)和15(8,15)(<0.003)。SAPS II和APACHE II根本无法预测死亡。
皮质醇对入住毒理学ICU的受试者的预后预测最佳。ALP中毒患者的皮质醇水平较高,可能是因为他们在毒性的最后阶段仍保持意识并意识到自身临床状况恶化,应激水平较高,或者可能是因为他们的血压显著较低。