Suppr超能文献

AD 和 PDD 中海马亚区与类别提示回忆的关系:一项多模态 MRI 研究。

Relationship between Hippocampal Subfields and Category Cued Recall in AD and PDD: A Multimodal MRI Study.

机构信息

Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, Italy.

Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, Italy.

出版信息

Neuroscience. 2018 Feb 10;371:506-517. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.12.028. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD) are characterized by a different mnesic failure, particularly in memory cued recall. Although hippocampal involvement has been shown in both these diseases, it remains unknown whether a selective damage of specific subfields within the hippocampus may be responsible for the peculiar mnesic profile observed in AD and PDD. To explore this topic, we combined a multimodal 3 T-MRI hippocampal evaluation (whole-brain T1-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging) with a hippocampal-targeted neuropsychological assessment (Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test [FCSRT]) in 22 AD subjects, 18 PDD and 17 healthy controls. Macro- and microstructural features (volume; shape; mean diffusivity [MD]; fractional anisotropy [FA]) of bilateral hippocampi (whole and subfields) were obtained. Correlations between MRI-derived parameters and neuropsychological evaluations were performed. In the comparison between AD and PDD, the multimodal analysis allowed us to identify that subiculum, CA1 and CA4-DG were differently involved in these diseases and correlated with immediate and delayed total recall items of FCSRT. Moreover, compared to controls, AD showed a reduction in almost all subfields, with a MD increase in the same regions, whereas PDD displayed a volume loss, less severe than AD, more evident in the CA2-3 and presubiculum subfields. Our study provides new evidence that hippocampal subregions had different vulnerability to damage related to AD and PDD. The combination of the in vivo analysis of hippocampal subfields with the FCSRT paradigm provided important insights into whether changes within specific hippocampal subfields are related to the different mnesic profile in AD and PDD patients.

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)和伴有痴呆的帕金森病(PDD)的特点是不同的记忆失败,尤其是在记忆提示回忆方面。虽然这两种疾病都显示出海马体的参与,但仍不清楚海马体内特定亚区的选择性损伤是否可能是 AD 和 PDD 中观察到的特殊记忆特征的原因。为了探讨这个问题,我们将多模态 3T-MRI 海马体评估(全脑 T1 加权和弥散张量成像)与海马体靶向神经心理学评估(自由和提示选择性提醒测试[FCSRT])相结合,对 22 名 AD 患者、18 名 PDD 患者和 17 名健康对照组进行了研究。获得了双侧海马体(整体和亚区)的宏观和微观结构特征(体积;形状;平均弥散度[MD];各向异性分数[FA])。对 MRI 衍生参数与神经心理学评估之间的相关性进行了分析。在 AD 和 PDD 之间的比较中,多模态分析使我们能够识别出海马旁回、CA1 和 CA4-DG 在这些疾病中有不同的参与,并与 FCSRT 的即时和延迟总回忆项目相关。此外,与对照组相比,AD 几乎所有亚区的体积都减少,同一区域的 MD 增加,而 PDD 则表现出体积减少,比 AD 程度较轻,在 CA2-3 和前下托亚区更为明显。我们的研究提供了新的证据,表明海马体亚区对与 AD 和 PDD 相关的损伤具有不同的易损性。海马体亚区的活体分析与 FCSRT 范式相结合,为特定海马体亚区的变化是否与 AD 和 PDD 患者的不同记忆特征有关提供了重要的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验