1 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
2 Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Baltimore Veterans Administration Medical Center , Baltimore, Maryland.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jan;20(1):32-38. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0250. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
Insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are commonly used by patients with diabetes mellitus in the outpatient setting. The efficacy and safety of initiating inpatient insulin pumps and CGM in the nonintensive care unit setting is unknown.
In a prospective pilot study, inpatients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive standard subcutaneous basal-bolus insulin and blinded CGM (group 1, n = 5), insulin pump and blinded CGM (group 2, n = 6), or insulin pump and nonblinded CGM (group 3, n = 5). Feasibility, glycemic control, and patient satisfaction were evaluated among groups.
Group 1 had lower mean capillary glucose levels, 144.5 ± 19.5 mg/dL, compared with groups 2 and 3, 191.5 ± 52.3 and 182.7 ± 59.9 mg/dL (P = 0.05). CGM detected 19 hypoglycemic episodes (glucose <70 mg/dL) among all treatment groups, compared with 12 episodes detected by capillary testing, although not statistically significant. No significant differences were found for the total daily dose of insulin or percentage of time spent below target glucose range (<90 mg/dL), in target glucose range (90-180 mg/dL), or above target glucose range (>180 mg/dL). On the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Change, group 3 reported increased hyperglycemia and decreased hypoglycemia frequency compared with the other two groups, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.
Insulin pump and CGM initiation are feasible during hospitalization, although they are labor intensive. Although insulin pump initiation may not lead to improved glycemic control, there is a trend toward CGM detecting a greater number of hypoglycemic episodes. Larger studies are needed to determine whether use of this technology can lower inpatient morbidity and mortality.
胰岛素泵和连续血糖监测(CGM)在门诊环境中常用于糖尿病患者。在非重症监护病房环境下启动住院患者胰岛素泵和 CGM 的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。
在一项前瞻性试点研究中,将 2 型糖尿病住院患者随机分为接受标准皮下基础-餐时胰岛素和盲法 CGM(第 1 组,n=5)、胰岛素泵和盲法 CGM(第 2 组,n=6)或胰岛素泵和非盲法 CGM(第 3 组,n=5)。在各组中评估可行性、血糖控制和患者满意度。
第 1 组的平均毛细血管血糖水平为 144.5±19.5mg/dL,低于第 2 组和第 3 组的 191.5±52.3 和 182.7±59.9mg/dL(P=0.05)。所有治疗组中 CGM 检测到 19 次低血糖发作(血糖<70mg/dL),而毛细血管检测到 12 次,尽管差异无统计学意义。胰岛素总日剂量或以下各血糖范围的时间百分比无显著差异,<90mg/dL、90-180mg/dL 和>180mg/dL。在糖尿病治疗满意度问卷-变化方面,第 3 组报告与其他两组相比,高血糖增加,低血糖减少,尽管差异无统计学意义。
胰岛素泵和 CGM 的启动在住院期间是可行的,尽管它们很费力。尽管胰岛素泵的启动可能不会导致血糖控制的改善,但 CGM 检测到低血糖发作的次数有增加的趋势。需要更大的研究来确定这种技术的使用是否可以降低住院患者的发病率和死亡率。