Suppr超能文献

六种频率适应性右心室心脏起搏器的运动性能比较。

Comparison of exercise performance of six rate-adaptive right ventricular cardiac pacemakers.

作者信息

Lau C P, Butrous G S, Ward D E, Camm A J

机构信息

Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1989 Apr 1;63(12):833-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90052-0.

Abstract

Single chamber cardiac pacemakers capable of automatically adjusting the rate according to body requirements have become an important means of physiologic pacing in patients with bradycardias. Such pacemakers are dependent on a nonatrial sensor of physiologic needs to optimize the rate response. Fifty rate-adaptive right ventricular pacemakers were implanted in 46 patients with a mean age of 60 +/- 4 years (mean +/- standard error of the mean). There were 2 types of activity-sensing pacemakers (Activitrax and Sensolog 702), the QT-sensing pacemakers (TX2 and Quintech), 2 types of respiratory-sensing pacemakers (Biorate [RDP3 and MB1] and Meta) and a rate-adaptive pacemaker that senses right ventricular dP/dt (Deltatrax). The rate responses of a group of 9 volunteers of similar age (62 +/- 2 years) were also included for comparison. Improvement in exercise duration in the rate-adaptive mode compared to the constant-rate ventricular pacing (VVI) mode was achieved during randomized symptom-limited treadmill exercise (from 26 to 49%). Compared with the sinus responses, the activity-sensing pacemakers responded most appropriately in speed. However, their rate responses were not related to workload and had lower correlations with estimated oxygen consumption (r = 0.7 and 0.47 for Activitrax and Sensolog, respectively). Respiratory-sensing pacemakers responded more appropriately in magnitude (r greater than 0.8) although their rate responses were slower. All pacemakers studied either showed no response or a reverse-rate response to the Valsalva maneuver. It is concluded that the currently available rate-adaptive ventricular pacemakers improve exercise performance compared with VVI pacemakers in patients with bradycardias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

能够根据身体需求自动调节心率的单腔心脏起搏器,已成为治疗心动过缓患者的重要生理性起搏手段。此类起搏器依赖非心房生理需求传感器来优化心率反应。对46例平均年龄为60±4岁(平均±平均标准误差)的患者植入了50台频率适应性右心室起搏器。有2种活动感知型起搏器(Activitrax和Sensolog 702)、QT感知型起搏器(TX2和Quintech)、2种呼吸感知型起搏器(Biorate [RDP3和MB1]和Meta)以及一种感知右心室dP/dt的频率适应性起搏器(Deltatrax)。还纳入了一组年龄相仿(62±2岁)的9名志愿者的心率反应进行比较。在随机症状限制的跑步机运动期间,与固定频率心室起搏(VVI)模式相比,频率适应性模式下的运动持续时间有所改善(从26%提高到49%)。与窦性反应相比,活动感知型起搏器在速度方面反应最为合适。然而,它们的心率反应与工作量无关,与估计的耗氧量相关性较低(Activitrax和Sensolog的r分别为0.7和0.47)。呼吸感知型起搏器在幅度方面反应更为合适(r大于0.8),尽管它们的心率反应较慢。所有研究的起搏器对瓦尔萨尔瓦动作要么无反应,要么呈反心率反应。结论是,与VVI起搏器相比,目前可用的频率适应性心室起搏器可改善心动过缓患者的运动表现。(摘要截短为250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验