• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文女性受虐经历量表在中国女性中的验证。

Validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory for Chinese Women.

机构信息

The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(21-22):4614-4639. doi: 10.1177/0886260517715602. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1177/0886260517715602
PMID:29294813
Abstract

This study aimed to revise and validate a Chinese version of Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (C-PMWI). In the preparation phase, the PMWI was first revised for the possible cultural differences between Chinese and non-Chinese women. Supplementary items on use of electronic devices as a contemporary form of monitoring were added. Forward and back translated items were reviewed by a panel of intimate partner violence (IPV) experts, resulting in the scale-level content validity index of 0.94. Cognitive debriefing was conducted to confirm comprehensibility. The newly revised measure was administered to the sample of 1,198 Chinese women, recruited from community centers and shelters in Hong Kong. Exploratory factor analysis conducted on data from half the sample revealed a two-factor structure similar to the original English version: emotional-verbal and dominance-isolation. This structure was verified by confirmatory factor analysis with the other half of the sample. Known-groups validity was demonstrated by significant differences in scores between women with different relationship histories. Moderate-to-strong correlations of the C-PMWI with other forms of IPV, controlling behaviors, relationship satisfaction, and depression established convergent validity. The C-PMWI showed good internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha >.9 for the entire scale and each subscale. The intraclass correlation across administrations 2 weeks was >.9, demonstrating test-retest reliability. The use of the comprehensive validation procedures in the present study provided evidence for both cultural appropriateness and satisfactory psychometric properties of the C-PMWI. The C-PMWI shows promise as a useful instrument for research and clinical practice with Chinese women.

摘要

本研究旨在修订和验证中文版心理虐待女性量表(C-PMWI)。在准备阶段,首先针对中国和非中国女性之间可能存在的文化差异对 PMWI 进行修订。添加了关于将电子设备用作当代监控形式的补充项目。经亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)专家小组审查,翻译后的项目具有 0.94 的量表水平内容效度指数。通过认知简报确认理解度。新修订的量表用于香港社区中心和庇护所招募的 1198 名中国女性样本。对一半样本数据进行的探索性因素分析揭示了与原始英文版相似的两因素结构:情感言语和支配隔离。通过对另一半样本进行验证性因素分析,验证了这一结构。通过不同关系史的女性之间评分的显著差异,证明了已知组别的有效性。C-PMWI 与其他形式的 IPV、控制行为、关系满意度和抑郁的中度至强相关性表明了其收敛效度。C-PMWI 具有良好的内部一致性,整个量表和每个分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 均>0.9。两次管理之间的组内相关系数>0.9,表明测试重测信度良好。本研究采用综合验证程序,为 C-PMWI 的文化适宜性和满意的心理测量特性提供了证据。C-PMWI 有望成为研究和临床实践中对中国女性有用的工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory for Chinese Women.中文女性受虐经历量表在中国女性中的验证。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(21-22):4614-4639. doi: 10.1177/0886260517715602. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Screening Tool for Psychological Intimate Partner Violence: Portuguese Validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory.亲密伴侣心理暴力筛查工具:《女性心理虐待量表》的葡萄牙语验证
Violence Vict. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):75-90. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00060.
3
The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory.《女性心理虐待量表》的验证
Violence Vict. 1999 Spring;14(1):25-37.
4
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
5
Validation of the scale for assessing the psychological vulnerability and its association with health of intimate partner violence victims in Chinese young adult population.评估心理脆弱性量表的验证及其与中国年轻成年人口中亲密伴侣暴力受害者健康的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235761. eCollection 2020.
6
Measurement properties of the chinese weinstein noise sensitivity scale.中文版温斯坦噪声敏感度量表的测量属性。
Noise Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;19(89):193-199. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_110_16.
7
Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women.中国成年女性中《气质性复原力量表》(DRS - 15)的跨文化及心理测量学验证
Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2489-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
8
Cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese Burden of Treatment Questionnaire (C-TBQ) in primary care patients with multi-morbidity.中文治疗负担问卷(C-TBQ)在患有多种疾病的初级保健患者中的文化适应性和心理测量特性。
Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):657-665. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz008.
9
Development and preliminary validation of the Traditional Chinese Antenatal Practice Scale among pregnant Hong Kong Chinese women.香港华裔孕妇中医产前护理实践量表的编制与初步验证
J Nurs Meas. 2013;21(1):120-36. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.21.1.120.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) among Hong Kong Chinese childhood cancer survivors.中文版匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)在香港中文儿童癌症幸存者中的心理计量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 6;19(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01803-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Composite Abuse Scale into Brazilian Portuguese.复合性虐待量表的巴葡译版翻译与文化调适。
Rev Saude Publica. 2022 Dec 9;56:98. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004196. eCollection 2022.
2
Nursing research on intimate partner violence in China: A scoping review.中国亲密伴侣暴力的护理研究:一项范围综述。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Sep 7;2:100017. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100017. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Validation of the scale for assessing the psychological vulnerability and its association with health of intimate partner violence victims in Chinese young adult population.
评估心理脆弱性量表的验证及其与中国年轻成年人口中亲密伴侣暴力受害者健康的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235761. eCollection 2020.