Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
University of Texas at Austin, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):132-159. doi: 10.1177/0886260517726971. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
Dating violence presents a serious threat for individual health and well-being. A growing body of literature suggests that starting in adolescence, individuals with sexual minority identities (e.g., individuals who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual) may be at an increased risk for dating violence compared with heterosexuals. Research has not, however, identified the mechanisms that explain this vulnerability. Using a diverse sample of young adults ( = 2,474), the current study explored how minority stress theory, revictimization theory, sex of sexual partners, and risky sexual behavior explained differences in dating violence between sexual minority and heterosexual young adults. Initial analyses suggested higher rates of dating violence among individuals who identified as bisexual, and individuals who identified as gay or lesbian when compared with heterosexuals, and further found that these associations failed to differ across gender. When mediating and control variables were included in the analyses, however, the association between both sexual minority identities and higher levels of dating violence became nonsignificant. Of particular interest was the role of discrimination, which mediated the association between bisexual identity and dating violence. Other factors, including sex and number of sexual partners, alcohol use, and childhood maltreatment, were associated with higher rates of dating violence but did not significantly explain vulnerability among sexual minority individuals compared with their heterosexual peers. These findings suggest the importance of minority stress theory in explaining vulnerability to dating violence victimization among bisexuals in particular, and generally support the importance of sexual-minority specific variables in understanding risk for dating violence within this vulnerable population.
约会暴力对个人健康和幸福构成严重威胁。越来越多的文献表明,从青春期开始,具有性少数群体身份的个体(例如,自认为是同性恋、女同性恋或双性恋的个体)与异性恋者相比,可能面临更高的约会暴力风险。然而,研究尚未确定解释这种脆弱性的机制。本研究使用了多样化的年轻成年人样本(n=2474),探讨了少数群体应激理论、再受害理论、性伴侣的性别和危险性行为如何解释性少数群体和异性恋年轻成年人之间约会暴力的差异。初步分析表明,与异性恋者相比,自认为是双性恋者以及自认为是同性恋或女同性恋者的个体报告的约会暴力发生率更高,进一步发现这些关联在性别间没有差异。然而,当分析中纳入中介和控制变量时,两种性少数群体身份与更高水平的约会暴力之间的关联变得不显著。特别值得关注的是歧视的作用,它介导了双性恋身份与约会暴力之间的关联。其他因素,包括性别和性伴侣数量、饮酒和儿童期虐待,与更高的约会暴力率相关,但与异性恋同龄人相比,并没有显著解释性少数群体个体的脆弱性。这些发现表明,少数群体应激理论在解释双性恋者特别容易受到约会暴力侵害方面的重要性,并且普遍支持在理解这个脆弱群体中约会暴力风险时,性少数群体特定变量的重要性。