Suppr超能文献

应对性侵犯幸存者的建议:一项关于幸存者及支持提供者的定性研究

Recommendations for Responding to Survivors of Sexual Assault: A Qualitative Study of Survivors and Support Providers.

作者信息

Kirkner Anne, Lorenz Katherine, Ullman Sarah E

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2021 Feb;36(3-4):1005-1028. doi: 10.1177/0886260517739285. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

Abstract

Empirical research has repeatedly examined the social reactions survivors receive from informal and formal support providers. This research has also provided an understanding of social reactions survivors perceive as helpful and hurtful. Advocacy agencies provide supplemental information instructing support providers how to respond to survivors in a positive way. However, these sources-to our knowledge-have not specifically asked survivors how they want to be responded to when disclosing assault and what they need in the aftermath of assault. Furthermore, studies have not asked support providers about how to respond to survivors in a positive way. Thus, the information provided to survivors and support providers on positive support may not be "survivor informed." This study examined recommendations for responding to survivors from two methods. First, as a broader approach, open-ended survey responses from = 1,863 survivors were examined for unprompted recommendations on what survivors need following assault. Second, in a sample of 45 informal support dyads, survivors and support providers were specifically asked to provide recommendations on responding to survivors in a positive way. Results include recommendations from survivors to informal supporters, formal service providers, and other survivors on what is needed in the aftermath of sexual assault. Results also include recommendations on responding to survivors in a positive way from interviewed support providers to other supporters.

摘要

实证研究反复考察了幸存者从非正式和正式支持提供者那里得到的社会反应。这项研究还让人了解到幸存者认为有帮助和有伤害的社会反应。宣传机构提供补充信息,指导支持提供者如何以积极的方式回应幸存者。然而,据我们所知,这些信息来源并没有专门询问幸存者在披露性侵事件时希望得到怎样的回应,以及在性侵事件发生后他们需要什么。此外,研究也没有询问支持提供者如何以积极的方式回应幸存者。因此,向幸存者和支持提供者提供的关于积极支持的信息可能并非“基于幸存者的意见”。本研究通过两种方法考察了回应幸存者的建议。首先,作为一种更广泛的方法,研究分析了来自1863名幸存者的开放式调查回复,以获取关于幸存者在性侵事件后需要什么的自发建议。其次,在一个由45对非正式支持关系组成的样本中,专门要求幸存者和支持提供者提供关于以积极方式回应幸存者的建议。结果包括幸存者对非正式支持者、正式服务提供者以及其他幸存者在性侵事件后所需内容的建议。结果还包括接受访谈的支持提供者对其他支持者以积极方式回应幸存者的建议。

相似文献

8
Are Survivors of Sexual Assault Blamed More Than Victims of Other Crimes?性侵犯幸存者比其他犯罪的受害者受到更多指责吗?
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Oct;37(19-20):NP18394-NP18416. doi: 10.1177/08862605211037423. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

3
4th DNA Forensic Symposium: Challenges and future directions in Africa.第四届DNA法医研讨会:非洲面临的挑战与未来方向
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Sep 18;9:100555. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100555. eCollection 2024.
4
The Needs of Women Survivors of Rape: A Narrative Review.强奸女性幸存者的需求:一项叙述性综述
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023 Nov 9;28(6):633-641. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_395_22. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
Reflections on researching rape resistance.关于研究抗强奸能力的思考。
Violence Against Women. 2014 Mar;20(3):343-50. doi: 10.1177/1077801214526308. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
3
Does self-defense training prevent sexual violence against women?自卫训练能防止针对女性的性暴力吗?
Violence Against Women. 2014 Mar;20(3):252-69. doi: 10.1177/1077801214526046. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
5
Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis.二元访谈分析的方法与结果。
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1642-55. doi: 10.1177/1049732310376520. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
6
The roots of resistance to women's self-defense.对女性自卫的抵制根源。
Violence Against Women. 2009 May;15(5):574-94. doi: 10.1177/1077801209331407. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验