• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健领域的有效可用性工程:关于可用且更安全的医疗信息技术的愿景。

Effective Usability Engineering in Healthcare: A Vision of Usable and Safer Healthcare IT.

作者信息

Kushniruk Andre, Senathirajah Yalini, Borycki Elizabeth

机构信息

School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada.

State University of New York, Brooklyn, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1066-1069.

PMID:29295265
Abstract

Persistent problems with healthcare IT that is unusable and unsafe have been reported worldwide. In this paper we present our vision for deploying usability engineering in healthcare in a more substantive way in order to improve the current situation. The argument will be made that stronger and more substantial efforts need to be made to bring multiple usability engineering methods to bear on points in both system design and deployment (and not just as a one-time effort restricted to software product development). In addition, improved processes for ensuring the usability of commercial vendor-based systems being implemented in healthcare organizations need to be addressed. A discussion will also be provided on challenges and barriers that will need to be overcome to ensure that the heatlhcare IT that is released is both usable and safe.

摘要

全球范围内都有关于医疗信息技术存在无法使用和不安全等持续性问题的报道。在本文中,我们提出了以更实质性的方式在医疗保健领域部署可用性工程的愿景,以改善当前状况。我们将论证,需要做出更有力、更实质性的努力,使多种可用性工程方法应用于系统设计和部署的各个环节(而不仅仅是作为一次性努力局限于软件产品开发)。此外,还需要解决改进流程以确保医疗组织中正在实施的基于商业供应商的系统的可用性问题。还将讨论为确保发布的医疗信息技术既可用又安全而需要克服的挑战和障碍。

相似文献

1
Effective Usability Engineering in Healthcare: A Vision of Usable and Safer Healthcare IT.医疗保健领域的有效可用性工程:关于可用且更安全的医疗信息技术的愿景。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1066-1069.
2
Low-Cost Rapid Usability Testing: Its Application in Both Product Development and System Implementation.低成本快速可用性测试:其在产品开发与系统实施中的应用
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:195-200.
3
Usability Methods for Ensuring Health Information Technology Safety: Evidence-Based Approaches. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group Health Informatics for Patient Safety.确保健康信息技术安全的可用性方法:循证方法。国际医学信息学会患者安全健康信息学工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:20-7.
4
Commercial versus in-situ usability testing of healthcare information systems: towards "public" usability testing in healthcare organizations.医疗信息系统的商业可用性测试与实地可用性测试:迈向医疗机构中的“公众”可用性测试
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:157-61.
5
Low-cost rapid usability engineering: designing and customizing usable healthcare information systems.低成本快速可用性工程:设计并定制可用的医疗信息系统。
Healthc Q. 2006;9(4):98-100, 102.
6
Emerging approaches to usability evaluation of health information systems: towards in-situ analysis of complex healthcare systems and environments.健康信息系统可用性评估的新方法:迈向复杂医疗系统与环境的现场分析
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:915-9.
7
Towards a Usability and Error "Safety Net": A Multi-Phased Multi-Method Approach to Ensuring System Usability and Safety.迈向可用性和错误“安全网”:一种确保系统可用性和安全性的多阶段多方法途径。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:763-767.
8
Exploring the relationship between usability and technology-induced error: unraveling a complex interaction.探索可用性与技术引发的错误之间的关系:解析复杂的相互作用。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:48-56.
9
Integrating heuristic evaluation with cognitive walkthrough: development of a hybrid usability inspection method.将启发式评估与认知走查相结合:一种混合可用性检查方法的开发。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:221-5.
10
From Usability Testing to Clinical Simulations: Bringing Context into the Design and Evaluation of Usable and Safe Health Information Technologies. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Engineering for Healthcare Informatics Working Group.从可用性测试到临床模拟:将情境融入可用且安全的健康信息技术的设计与评估。国际医学信息学协会医疗保健信息学人为因素工程工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:78-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment.为什么数字医疗保健系统设计仍然很差,以及为什么医疗保健实践没有要求更多?迈向可持续数字工作环境的三条路径。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 22;23(6):e26694. doi: 10.2196/26694.
2
Bridging the Gap Between Academic Research and Pragmatic Needs in Usability: A Hybrid Approach to Usability Evaluation of Health Care Information Systems.弥合可用性方面学术研究与实际需求之间的差距:一种用于医疗保健信息系统可用性评估的混合方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Nov 28;5(4):e10721. doi: 10.2196/10721.