Ryu Samuel, Maranzano Ernesto, Schild Steven E, Sahgal Arjun, Yamada Yoshiya, Hoskin Peter, Rades Dirk, Vichare Anushree, Hahn Carol, Holt Tanya
Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Stony Brook University, New York, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology Centre, "S. Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy.
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2015;3(3):237-245.
Treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) varies significantly. It is useful to understand how radiation oncologists worldwide deal with these challenging and urgent cases. Therefore, a survey of practice patterns of metastatic spinal cord compression was performed among the members of the major radiation oncology organizations in the world to help improve clinical practice.
The survey questions addressed common clinical issues related to the diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord compression in the context of the available data. The survey of practice pattern in the management of MSCC was performed in 2010. There were a total of 269 survey respondents, and 90% of respondents were from hospital-based practice. Statistical analyses were performed at ASTRO headquarter using Microsoft Excel and SPSS.
The practice pattern of initial diagnostic and clinical evaluation of patients for MSCC was fairly uniform across the continents and countries. Treatment decision was largely based on patient's general condition, overall oncologic status, and concomitant systemic chemotherapy in this survey. EBRT dose and fractionation patterns were determined by considering the estimated survival time, neurological status such as ambulatory status, previous radiation, and radiation treatment volume. Despite of using similar factors in making treatment decision, there was a significant difference in selecting the radiation dose and fractionation scheme. Selection of re-treatment radiation dose also varied and generally below the published tolerance dose.
Selection of radiation dose and fractionation varied significantly among different continents and countries, while using similar factors to make treatment decision.
转移性脊髓压迫症(MSCC)的治疗方法差异很大。了解全球放射肿瘤学家如何处理这些具有挑战性的急症很有必要。因此,对世界主要放射肿瘤学组织的成员进行了一项关于转移性脊髓压迫症治疗模式的调查,以帮助改善临床实践。
调查问题涉及在现有数据背景下与脊髓压迫症诊断和治疗相关的常见临床问题。2010年进行了MSCC管理实践模式的调查。共有269名受访者,90%的受访者来自医院实践。使用Microsoft Excel和SPSS在ASTRO总部进行统计分析。
各大洲和国家对MSCC患者进行初步诊断和临床评估的实践模式相当一致。在本次调查中,治疗决策主要基于患者的一般状况、整体肿瘤状态以及同步全身化疗。外照射放疗(EBRT)剂量和分割模式是通过考虑估计生存时间、神经状态(如行走状态)、既往放疗以及放疗体积来确定的。尽管在做出治疗决策时使用了相似的因素,但在选择放疗剂量和分割方案方面存在显著差异。再治疗放疗剂量的选择也各不相同,且通常低于已公布的耐受剂量。
在使用相似因素做出治疗决策的情况下,不同大洲和国家在放疗剂量和分割的选择上存在显著差异。