Sanz Jaime, Kwon Mi, Bautista Guiomar, Sanz Miguel A, Balsalobre Pascual, Piñana José Luis, Solano Carlos, Duarte Rafael, Ferrá Christelle, Lorenzo Ignacio, Martín Carmen, Barba Pere, Pascual María Jesús, Martino Rodrigo, Gayoso Jorge, Buño Ismael, Regidor Carmen, de la Iglesia Almudena, Montoro Juan, Díez-Martín José Luis, Sanz Guillermo F, Cabrera Rafael
Hospital Universitari y Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Blood Adv. 2017 Jun 20;1(15):1047-1055. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017006999. eCollection 2017 Jun 27.
We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of adults with acute leukemia who received single-unit umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation (sUCBT) (n = 135) or stem cell transplant using coinfusion of a UCB graft with CD34 cells from a third-party donor (Haplo-Cord) (n = 72) at different institutions within the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético. In multivariable analysis, patients in the Haplo-Cord group showed more rapid neutrophil (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.3; < .001) and platelet recovery (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3; = .015) and lower incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (relative risk, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; = .01). Nonrelapse mortality, relapse, disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD/relapse-free survival were similar in the 2 groups. Regarding disease-specific outcomes, DFS in both acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients was not significantly different; however, a significantly higher relapse rate was found in patients with AML treated with Haplo-Cord (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1-5.4; = .04). Our study confirms that Haplo-Cord was an effective strategy to accelerate neutrophil and platelet recovery and shows that, in the context of specific treatment platforms, sUCBT and Haplo-Cord offer similar long-term outcomes.
我们进行了回顾性比较,研究西班牙造血移植协作组内不同机构中接受单单位脐血移植(sUCBT)(n = 135)或使用来自第三方供体的CD34细胞与脐血移植物共同输注的干细胞移植(单倍体脐血移植 [Haplo-Cord])(n = 72)的成年急性白血病患者的临床结局。在多变量分析中,单倍体脐血移植组的患者中性粒细胞恢复更快(风险比 [HR],2.3;95%置信区间 [CI],1.5 - 3.3;P <.001),血小板恢复也更快(HR,1.6;95%CI,1.2 - 2.3;P =.015),慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的发生率更低(相对风险,0.5;95%CI,0.3 - 0.8;P =.01)。两组的非复发死亡率、复发率、无病生存率(DFS)以及无GVHD/复发生存率相似。关于疾病特异性结局,急性髓系白血病(AML)和急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的DFS均无显著差异;然而,接受单倍体脐血移植治疗的AML患者复发率显著更高(HR,2.3;95%CI,1 - 5.4;P =.04)。我们的研究证实,单倍体脐血移植是加速中性粒细胞和血小板恢复的有效策略,并表明在特定治疗平台的背景下,单单位脐血移植和单倍体脐血移植提供相似的长期结局。