Suppr超能文献

成人脐带血移植的总生存率与匹配相关移植相当,且 GRFS 改善。

Adult cord blood transplant results in comparable overall survival and improved GRFS vs matched related transplant.

机构信息

Division of Hematology.

Center for Innovative Design and Analysis, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, and.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2020 May 26;4(10):2227-2235. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001554.

Abstract

We compared outcomes among adult matched related donor (MRD) patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and adult patients undergoing double unit cord blood transplantation (CBT) at our center between 2010 and 2017. A total of 190 CBT patients were compared with 123 MRD patients. Median follow-up was 896 days (range, 169-3350) among surviving CBT patients and 1262 days (range, 249-3327) among surviving MRD patients. Comparing all CBT with all MRD patients, overall survival (OS) was comparable (P = .61) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) relapse-free survival (GRFS) was significantly improved among CBT patients (P = .0056), primarily because of decreased moderate to severe chronic GVHD following CBT (P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR], 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.26-7.04). Among patients undergoing our most commonly used MRD and umbilical cord blood (CB) myeloablative regimens, OS was comparable (P = .136) and GRFS was significantly improved among CBT patients (P = .006). Cumulative incidence of relapse trended toward decreased in the CBT group (P = .075; HR, 1.85; CI 0.94-3.67), whereas transplant-related mortality (TRM) was comparable (P = .55; HR, 0.75; CI, 0.29-1.95). Among patients undergoing our most commonly used nonmyeloablative regimens, OS and GRFS were comparable (P = .158 and P = .697). Cumulative incidence of both relapse and TRM were comparable (P = .32; HR, 1.35; CI, 0.75-2.5 for relapse and P = .14; HR, 0.482; CI, 0.18-1.23 for TRM). Our outcomes support the efficacy of CBT and suggest that among patients able to tolerate more intensive conditioning regimens at high risk for relapse, CB may be the preferred donor source.

摘要

我们比较了 2010 年至 2017 年期间在我们中心接受外周血造血干细胞移植的成人匹配相关供体(MRD)患者和接受双份脐带血移植(CBT)的成人患者的结局。共比较了 190 例 CBT 患者和 123 例 MRD 患者。在存活的 CBT 患者中,中位随访时间为 896 天(范围,169-3350),在存活的 MRD 患者中,中位随访时间为 1262 天(范围,249-3327)。将所有 CBT 患者与所有 MRD 患者进行比较,总生存率(OS)无差异(P=.61),CBT 患者移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)无复发存活率(GRFS)显著提高(P=.0056),主要是因为 CBT 后中重度慢性 GVHD 减少(P<.0001;风险比[HR],3.99;95%置信区间[CI],2.26-7.04)。在接受我们最常用的 MRD 和脐带血(CB)清髓性治疗方案的患者中,OS 无差异(P=.136),CBT 患者的 GRFS 显著提高(P=.006)。CBT 组的复发累积发生率呈下降趋势(P=.075;HR,1.85;CI 0.94-3.67),而移植相关死亡率(TRM)无差异(P=.55;HR,0.75;CI,0.29-1.95)。在接受我们最常用的非清髓性治疗方案的患者中,OS 和 GRFS 无差异(P=.158 和 P=.697)。复发和 TRM 的累积发生率无差异(P=.32;HR,1.35;CI 0.75-2.5 用于复发,P=.14;HR,0.482;CI 0.18-1.23 用于 TRM)。我们的结果支持 CBT 的疗效,并表明在能够耐受更高复发风险的强化预处理方案的患者中,CB 可能是首选供体来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba2/7252552/b60619d29a24/advancesADV2020001554absf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验