McCarthy Randy J, Wells Brett M, Skowronski John J, Carlston Donal E
Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2018 Aug;121(4):615-634. doi: 10.1177/0033294117736317. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
Four studies pursued the idea that spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) involve the formation of both inferential knowledge and associative knowledge while spontaneous trait transferences (STTs) involve only the formation of associative knowledge. These studies varied the type and amount of behavioral information from which perceivers could extract trait information. Experiments 1a and 1b used a modified savings-in-relearning paradigm and demonstrated that repeated presentations of an individual and a behavior description increased the strength of association between the target and implied trait, and this effect did not depend on whether the repeated presentations involved redundant information or new information. In comparison, Experiments 2a and 2b used a trait ratings dependent variable and demonstrated that the effects of repetition were stronger for STI, but not STT, when the added information differed from information that was previously encountered, but not when it was redundant with the previously encountered information.
四项研究探讨了这样一种观点,即自发特质推理(STIs)涉及推理知识和联想知识的形成,而自发特质转移(STTs)仅涉及联想知识的形成。这些研究改变了感知者可以从中提取特质信息的行为信息的类型和数量。实验1a和1b使用了一种修改后的再学习节省范式,证明个体和行为描述的重复呈现增加了目标与隐含特质之间的关联强度,并且这种效应不取决于重复呈现涉及的是冗余信息还是新信息。相比之下,实验2a和2b使用特质评分作为因变量,证明当添加的信息与先前遇到的信息不同时,重复对STI的影响更强,但对STT则不然,而当添加的信息与先前遇到的信息冗余时,情况并非如此。