Suppr超能文献

教育工作者对精神科医生的污名化。

Stigmatization of psychiatrists by pedagogues.

作者信息

Witusik Andrzej

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Institute of Pedagogical Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Piotrkow Trybunalski Branch.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2017 Dec 22;43(258):264-267.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Psychiatrists, as well as their patients, are the objects of the stigmatization process. The question arises as to whether stigmatization of psychiatrists is a phenomenon that occurs among the pedagogues. Answering this question has an important social dimension because it is the teacher and the pedagogue who shapes the attitudes of young people.

AIM

Aim of the study was preliminary, pilot assessment of the severity of stigmatization of psychiatrists by teachers and educators who do not have everyday contact with mentally ill patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved a survey of 64 teachers and educators supplementing their education within the system of various postgraduate courses and complementary second-cycle master studies. The control group consisted of pedagogues and social workers working with mentally ill subjects in social welfare homes, community self-help homes and social assistance (54 persons). A survey questionnaire of own design was used to evaluate the stigmatization process.

RESULTS

The first question concerning "assimilation of psychiatrists to their patients" was answered "yes" by 50 respondents from the study group and 13 from the control group (OR 11.236; 95% - 95 percent confidence interval CI 4.76-26.63). Question 2, regarding the choice of the profession of a psychiatrist by people suffering from mental disorders themselves was answered "yes" by 51 respondents from the study group and 14 from the control group (OR 11.21; 95% CI 4.74-26.52). The answer "yes" to the third question about "screening of the people they are talking to by psychiatrists" was obtained from 40 subjects in the study group and 5 in the control group (OR 4.33; 95% CI 3.13-17.21). The fourth question concerning attentive scrutinizing of other people by psychiatrists was answered "yes" by 42 subjects in the study group and 5 in the control group (OR 8.40; 95% CI 3.26-19.82). 51 people from the study group and 5 from the control group (OR 35; 00 95% CI 11.72 to 104.57) did not want to have any contact with a psychiatrist. The statement that psychiatrists are "weird" more often than other doctors was given by 49 subjects from the study group and 10 from the control group (OR 14.37; 95% CI 5.86- 35.27). The opinion that "if someone is not suitable for a surgeon or an internist they choose the profession of a psychiatrist" was expressed by 48 subjects from the study group and 9 control subjects (OR 15.00; 95% CI 6.02 is 37.35). The "strange and incomprehensible" behaviors of psychiatrists were indicated by 45 subjects from the study group and 9 from the control group (OR 11.94; 95% CI 4.84-28.96). The notion that a psychiatrist can be recognized by strange behavior was indicated also by 45 study group and 9 control group respondents (OR 11.94; 95% CI 4,84-28,96). 52 subjects from the group of pedagogues and 8 from the control group (OR 24.91; 95% CI 9.36- 66.29) would not like to make friends with a psychiatrist. The view that psychiatrists, "speak to themselves and dress strangely" was expressed by 50 study group and 13 control group respondents (OR 11.236; 95% - 95 CI 4.76-26.63). There were 46 subjects in the study group and 9 in the control group (OR 12.77, 95% CI 5.19-31.41) who stated that psychiatrists should be avoided.

CONCLUSIONS

The profession of a psychiatrist is the object of stigmatization in the group of teachers and pedagogues not working with people with mental disorders. Working with psychiatric patients and psychiatrists does not completely counteract the process of stigmatization of psychiatrists.

摘要

未标注

精神科医生以及他们的患者都是污名化过程的对象。问题在于,精神科医生的污名化现象是否在教育工作者群体中存在。回答这个问题具有重要的社会意义,因为正是教师和教育工作者塑造着年轻人的态度。

目的

本研究的目的是对那些日常不接触精神病患者的教师和教育工作者对精神科医生污名化的严重程度进行初步的、试点性评估。

材料与方法

该研究对64名在各种研究生课程体系和补充性第二周期硕士学习中进修的教师和教育工作者进行了调查。对照组由在社会福利院、社区自助之家和社会救助机构中与精神病患者打交道的教育工作者和社会工作者组成(54人)。使用自行设计的调查问卷来评估污名化过程。

结果

关于“将精神科医生与他们的患者等同看待”的第一个问题,研究组中有50名受访者回答“是”,对照组中有13名回答“是”(比值比11.236;95%——95%置信区间4.76 - 26.63)。关于精神疾病患者自己选择精神科医生职业的问题2,研究组中有51名受访者回答“是”,对照组中有14名回答“是”(比值比11.21;95%置信区间4.74 - 26.52)。关于“精神科医生会对他们交谈的人进行筛选”的第三个问题,研究组中有40名受访者回答“是”,对照组中有5名回答“是”(比值比4.33;95%置信区间3.13 - 17.21)。关于精神科医生会仔细审视他人的第四个问题,研究组中有42名受访者回答“是”,对照组中有5名回答“是”(比值比8.40;95%置信区间3.26 - 19.82)。研究组中有51人,对照组中有5人(比值比35;00 95%置信区间11.72至104.57)不想与精神科医生有任何接触。研究组中有49名受访者,对照组中有10名受访者表示精神科医生比其他医生“更怪异”(比值比14.37;95%置信区间5.86 - 35.27)。研究组中有48名受访者,对照组中有9名受访者表达了“如果某人不适合成为外科医生或内科医生,他们就会选择精神科医生职业”的观点(比值比15.00;95%置信区间6.02至37.35)。研究组中有

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验