Dankbaar Jan W, Oosterbroek Jaap, Jager Elise A, de Jong Hugo W, Raaijmakers Cornelis P, Willems Stefan M, Terhaard Chris H, Philippens Marielle E, Pameijer Frank A
Department of Radiology University Medical Center Utrecht the Netherlands.
Image Sciences Institute University Medical Center Utrecht the Netherlands.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017 Oct 31;2(6):373-379. doi: 10.1002/lio2.114. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Staging of laryngeal cancer largely depends on cartilage invasion. Presence of cartilage invasion affects treatment choice and prognosis. On MRI and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) it may be challenging to differentiate cartilage invasion from inflammation. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic properties of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCECT) and CECT for visual detection of cartilage invasion in laryngeal cancer.
Prospective cohort study.
Patients with T3 or T4 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with total laryngectomy were evaluated using 0.625 mm slice CT. DCECT derived permeability and blood volume maps and CECT images were visually evaluated for the presence of invasion of the cartilaginous T-stage subsites of laryngeal cancer, by detecting continuity with the tumor-bulk of increased permeability, increased blood volume, and enhancement. Histological evaluation of the surgical total laryngectomy specimen served as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated and compared using the McNemar and Chi-squared test.
From 14 included patients, a total of 462 subsites were available for T-stage analyss, of which 84 were cartilage. The median time between CT imaging and total laryngectomy was 1 day (range 1-34 days). There was no significant difference in the detection of cartilage invasion between DCECT and CECT. The sensitivity of CECT was better for all subsites combined (0.85 vs. 0.75; < 0.01).
DCECT does not improve visual detection of cartilage invasion in T3 and T4 laryngeal cancer compared to CECT.
2b, individual cohort study.
喉癌的分期很大程度上取决于软骨侵犯情况。软骨侵犯的存在会影响治疗方案的选择和预后。在磁共振成像(MRI)和增强CT(CECT)上,区分软骨侵犯与炎症可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是比较动态增强CT(DCECT)和CECT在视觉上检测喉癌软骨侵犯的诊断特性。
前瞻性队列研究。
对接受全喉切除术治疗的T3或T4期喉鳞状细胞癌患者使用0.625mm层厚的CT进行评估。通过检测与肿瘤主体的连续性,观察DCECT得出的通透性和血容量图以及CECT图像,以判断喉癌软骨T分期亚部位是否存在侵犯,观察指标包括通透性增加、血容量增加和强化情况。手术切除的全喉标本的组织学评估作为金标准。计算敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值,并使用McNemar检验和卡方检验进行比较。
纳入的14例患者中,共有462个亚部位可用于T分期分析,其中84个为软骨亚部位。CT成像与全喉切除术之间的中位时间为1天(范围1 - 34天)。DCECT和CECT在检测软骨侵犯方面无显著差异。对于所有亚部位综合评估,CECT的敏感性更好(0.85对0.75;P < 0.01)。
与CECT相比,DCECT在T3和T4期喉癌中并未改善对软骨侵犯的视觉检测。
2b,个体队列研究。