Pucėtaitė Milda, Farina Davide, Ryškienė Silvija, Mitraitė Dalia, Tarasevičius Rytis, Lukoševičius Saulius, Padervinskis Evaldas, Vaitkus Saulius
Department of Radiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickevičiaus Str. 9, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 3;13(3):891. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030891.
Accurate assessment of thyroid cartilage invasion in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the larynx remains a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of non-ossified thyroid cartilage invasion in patients with SCC. CEUS, CECT, and MRI scans of 27 male patients with histologically proven SCC were evaluated and compared. A total of 31 cases were assessed via CEUS and CECT. The MR images of five patients and six cases were excluded (one patient had two suspected sites), leaving twenty-five cases for analysis via MRI. CEUS showed the highest accuracy and specificity compared with CECT and MRI (87.1% vs. 64.5% and 76.0% as well as 84.0% vs. 64.0% and 72.7%, respectively). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CEUS and MRI were the same (100%). CEUS yielded four false-positive findings. However, there were no statistically significant differences among the imaging modalities ( > 0.05). CEUS showed better diagnostic performance than CECT and MRI. Therefore, CEUS has the potential to accurately assess non-ossified thyroid cartilage invasion and guide appropriate treatment decisions, hopefully leading to improved patient outcomes.
在临床实践中,准确评估喉鳞状细胞癌(SCC)中甲状腺软骨侵犯情况仍然是一项挑战。本研究的目的是评估超声造影(CEUS)、CT增强扫描(CECT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在检测SCC患者非骨化性甲状腺软骨侵犯方面的诊断性能。对27例经组织学证实为SCC的男性患者的CEUS、CECT和MRI扫描结果进行了评估和比较。共有31例通过CEUS和CECT进行评估。排除了5例患者的MR图像和6个病例(1例患者有2个可疑部位),剩余25例通过MRI进行分析。与CECT和MRI相比,CEUS显示出最高的准确性和特异性(分别为87.1%对64.5%和76.0%,以及84.0%对64.0%和72.7%)。CEUS和MRI的敏感性和阴性预测值相同(均为100%)。CEUS有4例假阳性结果。然而,各成像方式之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。CEUS的诊断性能优于CECT和MRI。因此,CEUS有潜力准确评估非骨化性甲状腺软骨侵犯并指导做出合适的治疗决策,有望改善患者预后。