Department of Anesthesiology, Gulou School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jan 4;24:67-75. doi: 10.12659/msm.904378.
BACKGROUND The objective of the present study was to evaluate the varying efficacy of general anesthesia (GA), combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA), and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIAL AND METHODS From July 2013 to May 2015, a total of 197 cases of patients who had undergone TKA treatment at either the Drum Tower Hospital or Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command were recruited to participate in the study. The patients in the study were separated into 3 groups depending on the anesthesia approach received: the GA group, the CSEA group, and the TIVA group. The baseline characteristics and relative parameters of patients were monitored before and after surgery for analytic purposes. A 3-month follow-up after surgery was conducted to observe the rate of DVT occurrence and any DVT-related complications. RESULTS The TIVA group exhibited significant decreases in relation to the swallowing time reflex, extubation, and consciousness recovery in comparison to other groups in the study. Additionally, platelet count was significantly decreased and there was drastic extension of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in the CSEA group and the TIVA group. There were clear differences in the incidence of DVT and its complications among the 3 groups. The TIVA group displayed the lowest incidences of DVT and DVT-related complication during the study. Based on logistic regression analysis, the type of anesthesia was utilized as an independent correlative factor for the occurrence of DVT after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results obtained during the study established a clinical basis for comparative analysis of various anesthesia methods. We found that, compared with GA and CSEA, patients undergoing TIVA had a reduced rate of risk in relation to the occurrence of DVT following TKA.
本研究旨在评估全身麻醉(GA)、腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)和全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA)对全膝关节置换术(TKA)后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)发生的影响。
2013 年 7 月至 2015 年 5 月,197 例在南京军区南京总医院或南京鼓楼医院接受 TKA 治疗的患者入选本研究。根据接受的麻醉方式将患者分为 3 组:GA 组、CSEA 组和 TIVA 组。监测患者手术前后的基本特征和相关参数。术后 3 个月进行随访,观察 DVT 发生率和任何 DVT 相关并发症。
与其他组相比,TIVA 组的吞咽反射、拔管和意识恢复时间明显缩短。此外,CSEA 组和 TIVA 组血小板计数明显降低,活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)明显延长。3 组 DVT 及其并发症发生率差异有统计学意义。TIVA 组 DVT 及 DVT 相关并发症发生率最低。Logistic 回归分析显示,麻醉类型是术后 DVT 发生的独立相关因素。
本研究结果为比较分析各种麻醉方法提供了临床依据。与 GA 和 CSEA 相比,TIVA 患者在 TKA 后发生 DVT 的风险较低。