Ogirala R G, Agarwal V, Aldrich T K
Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine-Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10467-2490.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Apr;139(4):984-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.4.984.
The Raja pleural biopsy needle, 3 mm in external diameter and fitted with a titanium alloy biopsy flap, was compared with the Abrams needle in six dogs with experimentally induced pleural effusion. One hundred twenty-four pleural biopsies were performed using either the Raja needle or the Abrams needle (62 with each needle). No complication occurred with either needle. The Raja pleural biopsy needle yielded a statistically significant larger pleural tissue specimen with a statistically significant lower frequency of crush artifacts. The size of the pleura obtained by the Abrams needle averaged 4,401 +/- 559 microns2 (mean +/- SE) compared with 8,652 +/- 1,099 microns2 with the Raja needle (p less than 0.01; Student two-tailed t test). Biopsies by the Abrams needle showed crush artifacts in 25.8% of the specimens, whereas 8.06% of biopsies with the Raja needle showed crush artifacts (p less than 0.02; Fisher's two-tailed exact test). In conclusion, the Raja pleural biopsy needle is safe to use and, despite its smaller diameter (3mm versus 4mm external diameter of the Abrams needle), yields significantly larger and less frequently distorted pleural specimens.
将外径3毫米、配有钛合金活检瓣的拉贾胸膜活检针与艾布拉姆斯针在6只实验性诱导胸腔积液的犬身上进行比较。使用拉贾针或艾布拉姆斯针进行了124次胸膜活检(每种针各62次)。两种针均未出现并发症。拉贾胸膜活检针获取的胸膜组织标本在统计学上显著更大,且挤压伪像的出现频率在统计学上显著更低。艾布拉姆斯针获取的胸膜平均大小为4401±559平方微米(均值±标准误),而拉贾针为8652±1099平方微米(p<0.01;学生双尾t检验)。艾布拉姆斯针活检的标本中有25.8%出现挤压伪像,而拉贾针活检的标本中8.06%出现挤压伪像(p<0.02;费舍尔双尾精确检验)。总之,拉贾胸膜活检针使用安全,尽管其直径较小(3毫米,而艾布拉姆斯针外径为4毫米),但能获取显著更大且更少出现变形的胸膜标本。