Suppr超能文献

一种改良的艾布拉姆斯针吸活检技术。

A modified Abrams needle biopsy technique.

作者信息

Kirsch C M, Kroe D M, Jensen W A, Kagawa F T, Wehner J H, Campagna A C

机构信息

Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1995 Oct;108(4):982-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.4.982.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic sensitivity of a modified Abrams needle pleural biopsy technique (A1) with the standard Abrams (A2) and Cope needle biopsy methods. The modified Abrams pleural biopsy technique consisted of suctioning each tissue sample into a syringe without removing the needle completely from the chest until the completion of the entire procedure. Both the standard Abrams and Cope needle techniques required needle removal from the chest after each pleural biopsy.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart analysis.

SETTING

Community teaching hospital affiliated with Stanford University.

PATIENTS

Forty-seven patients (30 men and 17 women) with a mean age 44.5 years (range, 19 to 81 years) who were referred to a pulmonary consultation service for pleural biopsy.

INTERVENTIONS

Two of us (C. M. K. and F. T. K.) used the modified Abrams technique and two of us (W. A. J. and A. C. C.) used the standard Abrams technique. The Cope needle was used as originally described.

MEASUREMENTS

We recorded the type of pleural biopsy needle and technique used in each patient. Biopsy specimen diameter and number of tissue samples obtained, final diagnoses, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The diagnostic sensitivity for tuberculous pleurisy was 82% for the modified Abrams method, 71% for the standard Abrams method, and 88% for the standard Cope technique (p > or = 0.3). There was no difference in size of tissue sample obtained (A1 vs A2), number of biopsies, or complications among the three methods of pleural biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified method of Abrams needle biopsy demonstrates a diagnostic sensitivity for pleural tuberculosis (82%) that is equivalent to that for the standard Abrams or Cope methods.

摘要

研究目的

比较改良艾布拉姆斯针胸膜活检技术(A1)与标准艾布拉姆斯(A2)及科普针活检方法的诊断敏感性。改良艾布拉姆斯胸膜活检技术是在整个操作完成前,将每个组织样本吸进注射器,而针不完全从胸腔拔出。标准艾布拉姆斯和科普针技术在每次胸膜活检后都需要将针从胸腔拔出。

设计

回顾性图表分析。

地点

斯坦福大学附属社区教学医院。

患者

47例患者(30例男性和17例女性),平均年龄44.5岁(范围19至81岁),因胸膜活检被转诊至肺部咨询服务处。

干预措施

我们两人(C.M.K.和F.T.K.)使用改良艾布拉姆斯技术,另外两人(W.A.J.和A.C.C.)使用标准艾布拉姆斯技术。科普针按最初描述使用。

测量指标

我们记录了每位患者使用的胸膜活检针类型和技术。记录活检标本直径、获得的组织样本数量、最终诊断结果及并发症。

结果

改良艾布拉姆斯方法对结核性胸膜炎的诊断敏感性为82%,标准艾布拉姆斯方法为71%,标准科普技术为88%(p≥0.3)。三种胸膜活检方法在获得的组织样本大小(A1对比A2)、活检次数或并发症方面无差异。

结论

改良的艾布拉姆斯针活检方法对胸膜结核的诊断敏感性(82%)与标准艾布拉姆斯或科普方法相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验