• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在诊断编码不可用时在回顾性数据库中识别银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者:一项将基于药物/开方者就诊的算法与诊断编码进行比较的验证研究

Identifying Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in Retrospective Databases When Diagnosis Codes Are Not Available: A Validation Study Comparing Medication/Prescriber Visit-Based Algorithms with Diagnosis Codes.

作者信息

Dobson-Belaire Wendy, Goodfield Jason, Borrelli Richard, Liu Fei Fei, Khan Zeba M

机构信息

QuintilesIMS, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

QuintilesIMS, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.012
PMID:29304935
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using diagnosis code-based algorithms is the primary method of identifying patient cohorts for retrospective studies; nevertheless, many databases lack reliable diagnosis code information.

OBJECTIVES

To develop precise algorithms based on medication claims/prescriber visits (MCs/PVs) to identify psoriasis (PsO) patients and psoriatic patients with arthritic conditions (PsO-AC), a proxy for psoriatic arthritis, in Canadian databases lacking diagnosis codes.

METHODS

Algorithms were developed using medications with narrow indication profiles in combination with prescriber specialty to define PsO and PsO-AC. For a 3-year study period from July 1, 2009, algorithms were validated using the PharMetrics Plus database, which contains both adjudicated medication claims and diagnosis codes. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of the developed algorithms were assessed using diagnosis code as the reference standard. Chosen algorithms were then applied to Canadian drug databases to profile the algorithm-identified PsO and PsO-AC cohorts.

RESULTS

In the selected database, 183,328 patients were identified for validation. The highest PPVs for PsO (85%) and PsO-AC (65%) occurred when a predictive algorithm of two or more MCs/PVs was compared with the reference standard of one or more diagnosis codes. NPV and specificity were high (99%-100%), whereas sensitivity was low (≤30%). Reducing the number of MCs/PVs or increasing diagnosis claims decreased the algorithms' PPVs.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed an MC/PV-based algorithm to identify PsO patients with a high degree of accuracy, but accuracy for PsO-AC requires further investigation. Such methods allow researchers to conduct retrospective studies in databases in which diagnosis codes are absent.

摘要

背景

使用基于诊断编码的算法是为回顾性研究识别患者队列的主要方法;然而,许多数据库缺乏可靠的诊断编码信息。

目的

在缺乏诊断编码的加拿大数据库中,开发基于用药申请/开处方就诊(MCs/PVs)的精确算法,以识别银屑病(PsO)患者和患有关节炎的银屑病患者(PsO-AC,银屑病关节炎的替代指标)。

方法

结合用药指征范围较窄的药物和开处方医生的专业领域来开发算法,以定义PsO和PsO-AC。在2009年7月1日起的3年研究期间,使用PharMetrics Plus数据库对算法进行验证,该数据库包含已判定的用药申请和诊断编码。以诊断编码作为参考标准,评估所开发算法的阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、敏感性和特异性。然后将选定的算法应用于加拿大药物数据库,以描述经算法识别的PsO和PsO-AC队列的特征。

结果

在选定的数据库中,共识别出183,328名患者用于验证。当将两个或更多MCs/PVs的预测算法与一个或更多诊断编码的参考标准进行比较时,PsO(85%)和PsO-AC(65%)的PPV最高。NPV和特异性较高(99%-100%),而敏感性较低(≤30%)。减少MCs/PVs的数量或增加诊断申请会降低算法的PPV。

结论

我们开发了一种基于MC/PV的算法,可高度准确地识别PsO患者,但PsO-AC的准确性需要进一步研究。此类方法使研究人员能够在缺乏诊断编码的数据库中进行回顾性研究。

相似文献

1
Identifying Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in Retrospective Databases When Diagnosis Codes Are Not Available: A Validation Study Comparing Medication/Prescriber Visit-Based Algorithms with Diagnosis Codes.在诊断编码不可用时在回顾性数据库中识别银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者:一项将基于药物/开方者就诊的算法与诊断编码进行比较的验证研究
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
2
Validation of claims-based algorithms to identify patients with psoriasis.基于申报的算法验证用于识别银屑病患者。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):868-874. doi: 10.1002/pds.5229. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Validation of claims-based algorithms for psoriatic arthritis.基于申报的银屑病关节炎算法验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;29(4):404-408. doi: 10.1002/pds.4950. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
4
Identifying and Characterizing Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in Ontario Administrative Data: A Population-based Study From 1991 to 2015.在安大略省行政数据中识别和描述银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者:一项基于人群的 1991 年至 2015 年的研究。
J Rheumatol. 2020 Nov 1;47(11):1644-1651. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190659. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
5
Validity of diagnostic codes and prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a managed care population, 1996-2009.1996-2009 年,在管理式医疗人群中,诊断代码的有效性和银屑病及银屑病关节炎的流行率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):842-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3447. Epub 2013 May 2.
6
A systematic review of validated methods for identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis using administrative or claims data.类风湿关节炎患者的行政或索赔数据识别方法的系统评价。
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 30;31 Suppl 10:K41-61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.075.
7
Clinical Burden of Concomitant Joint Disease in Psoriasis: A US-Linked Claims and Electronic Health Records Database Analysis.银屑病合并关节病的临床负担:一项基于美国索赔和电子健康记录数据库的分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2458-2471. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01698-7. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Identifying Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in Retrospective Databases When Diagnosis Code Is Not Available: A Validation Study Comparing Medication/Prescriber Visit Based Algorithms To Diagnosis Codes.当诊断代码不可用时,在回顾性数据库中识别银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者:一项比较基于药物/开处方者就诊的算法与诊断代码的验证研究。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A580-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1965. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
9
[Algorithms to identify chronic inflammatory rheumatism and psoriasis in medico-administrative databases: A review of the literature].[在医疗管理数据库中识别慢性炎症性风湿病和银屑病的算法:文献综述]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2021 Aug;69(4):225-233. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
10
Accuracy of Canadian health administrative databases in identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a validation study using the medical records of rheumatologists.加拿大健康管理数据库在识别类风湿关节炎患者中的准确性:一项使用风湿病医生病历的验证研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Oct;65(10):1582-91. doi: 10.1002/acr.22031.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance of development, validation, and evaluation of algorithms for populating health status in observational studies of routinely collected data (DEVELOP-RCD).观察性研究中基于常规收集数据来填补健康状况的算法的开发、验证和评估指南(DEVELOP-RCD)。
Mil Med Res. 2024 Aug 6;11(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00559-y.
2
Development and Validation of a META-Algorithm to Identify the Indications of Use of Biological Drugs Approved for the Treatment of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases from Claims Databases: Insights from the VALORE Project.从索赔数据库中识别获批用于治疗免疫介导性炎症疾病的生物药物使用指征的META算法的开发与验证:VALORE项目的见解
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jun 4;16:395-407. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S445120. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of a machine learning tool for the early identification of patients with undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis - A retrospective population-based study.一种用于早期识别未确诊银屑病关节炎患者的机器学习工具的评估——一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
J Transl Autoimmun. 2023 Aug 2;7:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2023.100207. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Usage and Adherence of Seven Advanced Therapies with Differing Mechanisms of Action for Inflammatory Arthritis in Canada.加拿大七种作用机制不同的炎症性关节炎先进疗法的使用情况及依从性
Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Oct;9(5):1399-1420. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00485-2. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
Are Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Undertreated? A Population-Based Study from Southern Italy.银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者是否治疗不足?一项来自意大利南部的基于人群的研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 31;10(15):3431. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153431.
6
Impact of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and methotrexate on diabetes mellitus among patients with inflammatory arthritis.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂和甲氨蝶呤对炎症性关节炎患者糖尿病的影响。
BMC Rheumatol. 2020 Sep 2;4:39. doi: 10.1186/s41927-020-00138-3. eCollection 2020.
7
Reduction in the utilization of prednisone or methotrexate in Canadian claims data following initiation of etanercept in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.加拿大索赔数据显示,在开始使用依那西普治疗幼年特发性关节炎儿童患者后,泼尼松或甲氨蝶呤的使用率降低。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019 Sep 10;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12969-019-0358-x.