Shein Steven L, Farhan Obada, Morris Nathan, Mahmood Nabihah, Alter Sherman J, Biagini Myers Jocelyn M, Gunkelman Samantha M, Kercsmar Carolyn M, Khurana Hershey Gurjit K, Martin Lisa J, McCoy Karen S, Ruddy Jennifer R, Ross Kristie R
Divisions of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine and
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Jan 5;8(2):89-95. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0088.
To identify associations between use of ipratropium and/or intravenous magnesium and outcomes of children hospitalized with acute asthma exacerbations and treated with continuous albuterol.
Secondary analysis of data from children prospectively enrolled in the multicenter Ohio Pediatric Asthma Repository restricted to only children who were treated with continuous albuterol in their initial inpatient location. Children were treated with adjunctive therapies per the clinical team.
Among 242 children who received continuous albuterol, 94 (39%) received ipratropium only, 13 (5%) received magnesium alone, 42 (17%) received both, and 93 (38%) received neither. The median duration of continuous albuterol was 7.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.8-12.0) hours. Ipratropium use was associated with a shorter duration of continuous albuterol (4.9 [IQR: 2.0-10.0] hours) compared with dual therapy (11.0 [IQR: 5.6-28.6] hours; = .001), but magnesium use was not (7.5 [IQR: 2.5-16.0] hours; = .542). In Cox proportional models (adjusted for hospital, demographics, treatment location, and respiratory failure), magnesium was associated with longer durations of continuous albuterol (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.77]; < .001) and hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.41 [95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.60]; < .001), but ipratropium was not.
Ipratropium and magnesium were both often used in children with severe asthma hospitalizations that required continuous albuterol therapy. Magnesium use was associated with unfavorable outcomes, possibly reflecting preferential treatment to patients with more severe cases and differing practices between centers. Given the high prevalence of asthma, wide variations in practice, and the potential to improve outcomes and costs, prospective trials of these adjunctive therapies are needed.
确定异丙托溴铵和/或静脉注射镁的使用与因急性哮喘加重住院并接受持续沙丁胺醇治疗的儿童的治疗结果之间的关联。
对前瞻性纳入多中心俄亥俄州儿科哮喘资料库的儿童数据进行二次分析,仅限于在其初始住院地点接受持续沙丁胺醇治疗的儿童。儿童由临床团队给予辅助治疗。
在242名接受持续沙丁胺醇治疗的儿童中,94名(39%)仅接受异丙托溴铵治疗,13名(5%)仅接受镁治疗,42名(17%)两者都接受,93名(38%)两者都未接受。持续沙丁胺醇的中位持续时间为7.0(四分位间距[IQR]:2.8 - 12.0)小时。与联合治疗(11.0[IQR:5.6 - 28.6]小时;P = 0.001)相比,使用异丙托溴铵与持续沙丁胺醇的持续时间较短(4.9[IQR:2.0 - 10.0]小时)相关,但使用镁则不然(7.5[IQR:2.5 - 16.0]小时;P = 0.542)。在Cox比例模型中(根据医院、人口统计学、治疗地点和呼吸衰竭进行调整),镁与持续沙丁胺醇的持续时间较长(风险比,0.54[95%置信区间:0.37 - 0.77];P < 0.001)和住院时间较长(风险比,0.41[95%置信区间:0.28 - 0.60];P < 0.001)相关,但异丙托溴铵则不然。
异丙托溴铵和镁常用于需要持续沙丁胺醇治疗的重度哮喘住院儿童。使用镁与不良结局相关,这可能反映了对病情较重患者的优先治疗以及各中心之间不同的治疗方法。鉴于哮喘的高患病率、治疗方法的广泛差异以及改善治疗结果和成本的潜力,需要对这些辅助治疗进行前瞻性试验。