Goggin N, Macarthur C, Parkin P C
Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Ontario, Canada.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Dec;155(12):1329-34. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.12.1329.
To determine whether the addition of inhaled ipratropium bromide to inhaled albuterol and systemic corticosteroid therapy was more efficacious than inhaled albuterol and systemic corticosteroids alone in the inpatient treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children.
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Pediatric inpatient unit of a tertiary urban hospital.
Eighty children (aged 1-18 years) hospitalized because of an acute asthma exacerbation.
Children were randomized to receive either nebulized ipratropium bromide, 250 microg, or nebulized isotonic sodium chloride solution, 1 mL. All children received albuterol and systemic corticosteroids.
The primary outcome variable was a validated clinical asthma score, measured at baseline and every 6 hours for 36 hours. Secondary outcome measures included the forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the oxygen saturation, the number of doses of inhaled study drug, the time to an inhaled drug-dosing interval of 4 hours, and the length of the hospital stay.
There were no differences between groups on baseline characteristics. The intention-to-treat analysis, using repeated-measures analysis of variance, showed no significant (P =.07) difference between the groups in the clinical asthma score over time. There were also no significant differences between groups on secondary outcomes.
The addition of nebulized ipratropium bromide to nebulized beta(2)-agonist and corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of children hospitalized because of asthma (following intensive emergency department treatment) confers no extra benefit.
确定在儿童急性哮喘加重期的住院治疗中,吸入异丙托溴铵联合吸入沙丁胺醇及全身用糖皮质激素治疗是否比单独使用吸入沙丁胺醇和全身用糖皮质激素更有效。
双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
一所城市三级医院的儿科住院部。
80名因急性哮喘加重而住院的儿童(年龄1 - 18岁)。
儿童被随机分为两组,分别接受250微克雾化吸入异丙托溴铵或1毫升雾化吸入等渗氯化钠溶液。所有儿童均接受沙丁胺醇和全身用糖皮质激素治疗。
主要观察变量为经过验证的临床哮喘评分,在基线时及之后36小时内每6小时测量一次。次要观察指标包括第1秒用力呼气量、血氧饱和度、吸入研究药物的剂量数、吸入药物给药间隔达4小时的时间以及住院时间。
两组在基线特征方面无差异。采用重复测量方差分析的意向性分析显示,两组在临床哮喘评分随时间的变化上无显著差异(P = 0.07)。两组在次要观察指标上也无显著差异。
在因哮喘住院的儿童(经过急诊科强化治疗后)中,雾化吸入异丙托溴铵联合雾化吸入β₂受体激动剂和糖皮质激素治疗并无额外益处。