Kamphuis Vivian P, Westenberg Jos J M, van der Palen Roel L F, van den Boogaard Pieter J, van der Geest Rob J, de Roos Albert, Blom Nico A, Roest Arno A W, Elbaz Mohammed S M
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jun;34(6):905-920. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1291-z. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
The aim of the current study was to assess the scan-rescan reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) kinetic energy (KE), viscous energy loss (EL) and vorticity during diastole from four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI) in healthy subjects. Twelve volunteers (age 27 ± 3 years) underwent whole-heart 4D flow MRI twice in one session. In-scan consistency was evaluated by correlation between KE and EL. EL was computed to measure the amount of EL relative to KE over diastole. Scan-rescan analysis was performed to test reproducibility of volumetric measurements of KE, EL, EL and vorticity in the LV over early (E) and late (A) diastolic filling. In-scan consistency between KE and EL was strong-excellent (E-filling scan1: r = 0.92, P < 0.001; scan2: ρ = 0.96, P < 0.001 and A-filling scan1: ρ = 0.87, P < 0.001; scan2: r = 0.99, P < 0.001). For the majority of subjects (10 out of 12), KE and EL measures showed good to strong reproducibility. However, with a wide range of agreement [intraclass correlation (ICC): 0.64-0.95] and coefficients of variation (CV) ≤ 25%. EL showed strong reproducibility for all 12 subjects with a strong ICC (0.94, P < 0.001) and a CV of 9%. Scan-rescan reproducibility of volumetric vorticity showed good-excellent ICCs (0.83-0.95) with CVs ≤ 11%. In conclusion, the current study shows strong-excellent in-scan consistency and overall good agreement between scans for 4D flow MRI assessment of left ventricular kinetic energy, energy loss and vorticity over diastole. However, substantial differences between the scans were also found in some parameters in two out of twelve subjects. Strong reproducibility was found in the dimensionless EL, which measures the amount of viscous energy loss relative to the average kinetic energy over diastole.
本研究的目的是评估健康受试者舒张期左心室(LV)动能(KE)、粘性能量损失(EL)和涡度在四维流动磁共振成像(4D流动MRI)中的扫描-再扫描重复性。12名志愿者(年龄27±3岁)在一次检查中接受了两次全心4D流动MRI检查。通过KE和EL之间的相关性评估扫描内一致性。计算EL以测量舒张期相对于KE的EL量。进行扫描-再扫描分析以测试LV在舒张早期(E)和晚期(A)充盈时KE、EL、EL和涡度的体积测量的重复性。KE和EL之间的扫描内一致性为强-优秀(E期充盈扫描1:r = 0.92,P < 0.001;扫描2:ρ = 0.96,P < 0.001;A期充盈扫描1:ρ = 0.87,P < 0.001;扫描2:r = 0.99,P < 0.001)。对于大多数受试者(12名中的10名),KE和EL测量显示出良好至强的重复性。然而,一致性范围较宽[组内相关系数(ICC):0.64 - 0.95]且变异系数(CV)≤25%。EL在所有12名受试者中显示出强重复性,ICC强(0.94,P < 0.001)且CV为9%。体积涡度的扫描-再扫描重复性显示出良好-优秀的ICC(0.83 - 0.95),CV≤11%。总之,本研究表明,对于舒张期左心室动能、能量损失和涡度的4D流动MRI评估,扫描内一致性为强-优秀,扫描间总体一致性良好。然而,在12名受试者中的两名受试者的一些参数中也发现了扫描之间的显著差异。发现无量纲EL具有强重复性,其测量舒张期相对于平均动能的粘性能量损失量。