Plemmons Christina, Clark Michele, Feng Du
West River Department, College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, 1011 11th Street, Rapid City, SD 57701, United States.
School of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway Box 453018, Las Vegas, NV 89154-3018, United States.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.029. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
Clinical education is vital to both the development of clinical self-efficacy and the integration of future nurses into health care teams. The dedicated education unit clinical teaching model is an innovative clinical partnership, which promotes skill development, professional growth, clinical self-efficacy, and integration as a team member. Blended clinical teaching models are combining features of the dedicated education unit and traditional clinical model.
The aims of this study are to explore how each of three clinical teaching models (dedicated education unit, blended, traditional) affects clinical self-efficacy and attitude toward team process, and to compare the dedicated education unit model and blended model to traditional clinical.
A nonequivalent control-group quasi-experimental design was utilized. The convenience sample of 272 entry-level baccalaureate nursing students included 84 students participating in a dedicated education unit model treatment group, 66 students participating in a blended model treatment group, and 122 students participating in a traditional model control group. Perceived clinical self-efficacy was evaluated by the pretest/posttest scores obtained on the General Self-Efficacy scale. Attitude toward team process was evaluated by the pretest/posttest scores obtained on the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Attitude Questionnaire.
All three clinical teaching models resulted in significant increases in both clinical self-efficacy (p=0.04) and attitude toward team process (p=0.003). Students participating in the dedicated education unit model (p=0.016) and students participating in the blended model (p<0.001) had significantly larger increases in clinical self-efficacy compared to students participating in the traditional model.
These findings support the use of dedicated education unit and blended clinical partnerships as effective alternatives to the traditional model to promote both clinical self-efficacy and team process among entry-level baccalaureate nursing students.
临床教育对于临床自我效能感的培养以及未来护士融入医疗团队至关重要。专门教育单元临床教学模式是一种创新的临床合作模式,可促进技能发展、专业成长、临床自我效能感以及作为团队成员的融入。混合式临床教学模式融合了专门教育单元和传统临床模式的特点。
本研究旨在探讨三种临床教学模式(专门教育单元、混合式、传统式)如何影响临床自我效能感和对团队协作过程的态度,并将专门教育单元模式和混合式模式与传统临床模式进行比较。
采用非等效对照组准实验设计。272名本科护理专业入门级学生的便利样本包括84名参与专门教育单元模式治疗组的学生、66名参与混合式模式治疗组的学生以及122名参与传统模式对照组的学生。通过在一般自我效能量表上获得的前测/后测分数评估感知临床自我效能感。通过在团队STEPPS®团队协作态度问卷上获得的前测/后测分数评估对团队协作过程的态度。
所有三种临床教学模式均使临床自我效能感(p = 0.04)和对团队协作过程的态度(p = 0.003)显著提高。与参与传统模式的学生相比,参与专门教育单元模式的学生(p = 0.016)和参与混合式模式的学生(p < 0.001)在临床自我效能感方面的提高显著更大。
这些发现支持使用专门教育单元和混合式临床合作模式作为传统模式的有效替代方案,以促进本科护理专业入门级学生的临床自我效能感和团队协作过程。