Kongshaug M, Moan J, Brown S B
Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo.
Br J Cancer. 1989 Feb;59(2):184-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.38.
The distribution among the main fractions of human plasma lipoproteins of a number of porphyrins with different tumour localising ability has been determined by means of ultracentrifugation. A main trend is that the fraction of the dyes that are bound to low density lipoprotein (LDL) increases, and the fraction bound to HSA decreases with decreasing polarity of the dyes. An asymmetric charge distribution, such as in TPPS2a, favours LDL-binding more than expected on the basis of lipophilicity. No correlation between the known tumour localising ability of the drugs tested in the present work and their relative affinity for LDL was found. One of the best tumour localisers reported in the literature, TPPS4, hardly binds to LDL, while Hp and Pp, which are commonly considered inefficient tumour localisers, do have a significant affinity for LDL. On the other hand, the LDL binding capacity for a drug is suggested to be a good index for cellular uptake. Such an index does not necessarily imply that the actual uptake occurs by the LDL pathway.
通过超速离心法测定了多种具有不同肿瘤定位能力的卟啉在人血浆脂蛋白主要组分中的分布情况。一个主要趋势是,随着染料极性的降低,与低密度脂蛋白(LDL)结合的染料比例增加,而与血清白蛋白(HSA)结合的比例降低。不对称电荷分布,如在四苯基卟吩二磺酸二钠盐(TPPS2a)中,比基于亲脂性预期的情况更有利于与LDL结合。在本研究中测试的药物的已知肿瘤定位能力与其对LDL的相对亲和力之间未发现相关性。文献中报道的最佳肿瘤定位剂之一四苯基卟吩四磺酸(TPPS4)几乎不与LDL结合,而通常被认为是低效肿瘤定位剂的血卟啉(Hp)和原卟啉(Pp)确实对LDL有显著亲和力。另一方面,药物的LDL结合能力被认为是细胞摄取的良好指标。这样一个指标并不一定意味着实际摄取是通过LDL途径发生的。