Suppr超能文献

癌症临床试验:替代患者在界定何为符合伦理道德的可接受临床试验方面的作用。

Clinical trials in cancer: the role of surrogate patients in defining what constitutes an ethically acceptable clinical experiment.

作者信息

Mackillop W J, Palmer M J, O'Sullivan B, Ward G K, Steele R, Dotsikas G

机构信息

Ontario Cancer Foundation, Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1989 Mar;59(3):388-95. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.78.

Abstract

Doctors who treat lung cancer in Ontario were previously asked how they would wish to be managed if they developed non-small cell lung cancer and whether they would consent to participate in six clinical trials for which they might be eligible. The proportion of these expert surrogate patients who would consent to each clinical trial ranged from 11 to 64%. The results of this study were transmitted to the same group of doctors who were asked to comment on the ethical acceptability of each trial in the light of this information. The majority of physicians said that those trials to which less than 50% of expert surrogates consented should not have been opened to patients. Sixty-nine per cent of doctors thought that new trials should be evaluated in this way. We also present the results of a survey of 400 lay people in Ontario who were asked to imagine that they had lung cancer and whether they would consent to participate in two of these same clinical trials. Fifty per cent of lay people consented to a randomised trial of lobectomy versus segmentectomy in early, operable disease (LCSC-821) compared to 64% of expert surrogates, and 48% of lay people consented to a randomised trial of five different forms of chemotherapy in metastatic disease (SWOG-8241) compared to 19% of doctors. It was concluded that the lay people were unable to discern differences in the acceptability of clinical trials which were clear to experts in the field. Subsequently, respondents were told about the decisions which doctors would make in the same circumstances and asked if this information would modify their previous decisions. There is no net change in the proportion of patients consenting to the surgery trial but the proportion of people consenting to the chemotherapy trial decreased by 40%. The majority of lay people said that they would wish to have access to this type of information before consenting to participate in a clinical trial.

摘要

此前,研究人员询问了安大略省治疗肺癌的医生,如果他们自己患上非小细胞肺癌,希望接受怎样的治疗,以及他们是否会同意参与六项他们可能符合条件的临床试验。这些专家替代患者中同意每项临床试验的比例在11%至64%之间。该研究结果传达给了同一组医生,要求他们根据这些信息对每项试验的伦理可接受性发表评论。大多数医生表示,专家替代患者中同意率低于50%的试验不应该向患者开放。69%的医生认为新试验应该以这种方式进行评估。我们还展示了一项对安大略省400名普通民众的调查结果,他们被要求设想自己患有肺癌,以及是否会同意参与其中两项相同的临床试验。50%的普通民众同意参加早期可手术疾病的肺叶切除术与肺段切除术随机试验(LCSC - 821),相比之下专家替代患者的同意率为64%;48%的普通民众同意参加转移性疾病的五种不同化疗方案随机试验(SWOG - 8241),相比之下医生的同意率为19%。研究得出结论,普通民众无法辨别该领域专家明确认可的临床试验可接受性差异。随后,受访者被告知医生在相同情况下会做出的决定,并询问这些信息是否会改变他们之前的决定。同意手术试验的患者比例没有净变化,但同意化疗试验的人数比例下降了40%。大多数普通民众表示,他们希望在同意参与临床试验之前能够获取此类信息。

相似文献

9
Clinical cancer research--some aspects on doctors' attitudes to informing participants.
Acta Oncol. 1996;35(6):749-54. doi: 10.3109/02841869609084010.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical challenges in conducting clinical research in lung cancer.肺癌临床研究中的伦理挑战。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016 Jun;5(3):219-26. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.03.04.
8
Brain tumor protocols in North America.北美的脑肿瘤治疗方案
J Neurooncol. 1993 Sep;17(3):231-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01049979.
9
Opinion polling and decision making: a critical appraisal of quality of life assessment.
Qual Life Res. 1994 Apr;3(2):155-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00435258.

本文引用的文献

1
On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.关于替代疗法偏好的引出。
N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103.
2
Obtaining informed consent. Form or substance.
Arch Intern Med. 1969 Jun;123(6):682-8.
3
Informed (but uneducated) consent.知情(但未经专业教育)同意。
N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 31;287(9):465-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197208312870912.
7
Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research.equipoise与临床研究伦理
N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 16;317(3):141-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验