• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部回忆:源检索与项目识别中的特征结合效应

Facial Recall: Feature-Conjunction Effects in Source Retrieval Versus Item Recognition.

作者信息

Nie Aiqing

机构信息

1 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Apr;125(2):369-386. doi: 10.1177/0031512517751725. Epub 2018 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1177/0031512517751725
PMID:29307254
Abstract

Within memory processing, feature and conjunction effects refer to higher false alarms (incorrectly naming items as previously seen) for stimuli with partial/all features taken from different previously studied versus novel items. In this study, we compared feature-conjunction effects in the memory tasks of both item recognition and source retrieval, using faces as stimuli. We found greater feature-conjunction effects on source retrieval versus item recognition tasks, though participants gave slower responses on source retrieval versus item recognition. Thus, our data were consistent with dual-process memory theory in which familiarity contributes to high false alarms in compound faces even while feature-conjunction effects enhance recollection in source retrieval.

摘要

在记忆加工过程中,特征效应和联合效应指的是,对于具有部分/所有特征取自不同先前学习项目而非新异项目的刺激,虚报率(将项目错误地命名为先前见过)更高。在本研究中,我们以面孔作为刺激,比较了项目识别和来源检索这两种记忆任务中的特征联合效应。我们发现,相较于项目识别任务,来源检索任务中的特征联合效应更大,尽管参与者在来源检索任务中的反应比项目识别任务中的反应更慢。因此,我们的数据与双加工记忆理论一致,即在复合面孔中,熟悉性导致了高虚报率,而特征联合效应则增强了来源检索中的回忆。

相似文献

1
Facial Recall: Feature-Conjunction Effects in Source Retrieval Versus Item Recognition.面部回忆:源检索与项目识别中的特征结合效应
Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Apr;125(2):369-386. doi: 10.1177/0031512517751725. Epub 2018 Jan 7.
2
Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.老年人虚假面部识别的认知机制。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):54-60. doi: 10.1037/a0024582. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
3
Repetition increases false recollection in older people.重复会增加老年人的错误记忆。
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Feb;56(1):38-44. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12168. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
4
What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.要点是什么?图式对真假记忆背后神经关联的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
5
Recognition of faces and names: multimodal physiological correlates of memory and executive function.面部与姓名识别:记忆和执行功能的多模态生理关联
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Jun;10(2):408-23. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9420-6.
6
Age-Related Differences in the Impact of Prior Knowledge on Recognition Performance: A Face Recognition Study.先前知识对识别表现影响的年龄相关差异:一项人脸识别研究。
Exp Aging Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):154-166. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2019.1586108. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Internal versus external features in triggering the brain waveforms for conjunction and feature faces in recognition.在识别联合面孔和特征面孔时,触发脑电波的内部特征与外部特征
Neuroreport. 2014 Aug 20;25(12):965-71. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000221.
8
Memory conjunction clusters: Influence of familiarity and recollection.记忆联结簇:熟悉度与回忆的影响
Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):792-800. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1051052. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Elements of person knowledge: Episodic recollection helps us to identify people but not to recognize their faces.个人知识要素:情景回忆有助于我们识别他人,但无法识别他们的面孔。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):218-228. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
10
Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials.熟悉度和回忆对联想识别记忆的贡献:来自事件相关电位的见解。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1595-605. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1595.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Item and Source Memory: Explanation of Connection-Strength Model.项目记忆与源记忆之间的关系:连接强度模型的解释
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:691577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691577. eCollection 2021.