Hardy-Werbin M, Arpí O, Taus A, Rocha P, Joseph-Pietras D, Nolan L, Danson S, Griffiths R, Lopez-Botet M, Rovira A, Albanell J, Ottensmeier C H, Arriola E
Cancer Research Program, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Nov 27;7(2):e1395125. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1395125. eCollection 2018.
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is often associated with paraneoplastic syndromes. To assess the role of anti-neuronal autoantibodies (NAAs) as biomarkers of treatment outcome, we assessed NAAs in serial samples from SCLC patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. We evaluated 2 cohorts: in cohort 1 (C1), 47 patients received standard platinum/etoposide, and in cohort 2 (C2), 38 patients received ipilimumab, carboplatin and etoposide. Serum samples at baseline and subsequent time points were analyzed for the presence of NAAs. NAAs were detected at baseline in 25 patients (53.2%) in C1 and in 20 patients (52.6%) in C2 (most frequently anti-Sox1). NAA at baseline was associated with limited disease (75% vs 50%; p: 0.096) and better overall survival (15.1 m vs 11.7 m; p: 0.032) in C1. Thirteen patients (28.9%) showed 2 or more reactivities before treatment; this was associated with worse PFS (5.5 m vs 7.3 m; p: 0.005) in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy. NAA titers decreased after therapy in 68.9% patients, with no differential patterns of change between cohorts. Patients whose NAA titer decreased after treatment, showed longer OS [18.5 m (95% CI: 15.8 - 21.2)] compared with those whose NAA increased [12.3 m (95% CI: 8.1 - 16.5; p 0.049)], suggesting that antibody levels correlate to tumor load. Our findings reinforce the role of NAAs as prognostic markers and tumor activity/burden in SCLC, warrant further investigation in their predictive role for immunotherapy and raise concern over the use of immunotherapy in patients with more than one anti-NAA reactivity.
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)常与副肿瘤综合征相关。为评估抗神经元自身抗体(NAA)作为治疗结果生物标志物的作用,我们对接受化学免疫疗法治疗的SCLC患者与仅接受化疗的患者的系列样本中的NAA进行了评估。我们评估了2个队列:在队列1(C1)中,47例患者接受标准铂类/依托泊苷治疗,在队列2(C2)中,38例患者接受伊匹木单抗、卡铂和依托泊苷治疗。分析基线及后续时间点的血清样本中是否存在NAA。在C1中,25例患者(53.2%)在基线时检测到NAA,在C2中,20例患者(52.6%)检测到NAA(最常见的是抗Sox1)。在C1中,基线时的NAA与疾病局限相关(75%对50%;p:0.096)且总生存期更好(15.1个月对11.7个月;p:0.032)。13例患者(28.9%)在治疗前表现出2种或更多种反应性;这与接受化学免疫疗法治疗的患者较差的无进展生存期相关(5.5个月对7.3个月;p:0.005)。68.9%的患者治疗后NAA滴度下降,各队列之间无差异变化模式。治疗后NAA滴度下降的患者与NAA滴度升高的患者相比,总生存期更长[18.5个月(95%CI:15.8 - 21.2)]对[12.3个月(95%CI:8.1 - 16.5;p 0.049)],这表明抗体水平与肿瘤负荷相关。我们的研究结果强化了NAA作为SCLC预后标志物及肿瘤活性/负担的作用,有必要进一步研究其在免疫治疗中的预测作用,并对具有一种以上抗NAA反应性的患者使用免疫治疗引发关注。