Sankar Mari Jeeva, Sankar Jhuma, Chandra Parijat
Newborn Health Knowledge Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for Training and Research in Newborn Care, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 8;1(1):CD009734. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009734.pub3.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in angiogenesis in foetal life. Researchers have recently attempted to use anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a vasoproliferative disorder. The safety and efficacy of these agents in preterm infants with ROP is currently uncertain.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF drugs when used either as monotherapy, that is without concomitant cryotherapy or laser therapy, or in combination with planned cryo/laser therapy in preterm infants with type 1 ROP (defined as zone I any stage with plus disease, zone I stage 3 with or without plus disease, or zone II stage 2 or 3 with plus disease).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1966 to 11 December 2016), Embase (1980 to 11 December 2016), CINAHL (1982 to 11 December 2016), and conference proceedings.
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy or safety of administration, or both, of anti-VEGF agents compared with conventional therapy in preterm infants with ROP.
We used standard Cochrane and Cochrane Neonatal methods for data collection and analysis. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence.
Six trials involving a total of 383 infants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five trials compared intravitreal bevacizumab (n = 4) or ranibizumab (n = 1) with conventional laser therapy (monotherapy), while the sixth study compared intravitreal pegaptanib plus conventional laser therapy with laser/cryotherapy (combination therapy).When used as monotherapy, bevacizumab/ranibizumab did not reduce the risk of complete or partial retinal detachment (3 studies; 272 infants; risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 5.13; risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.04; very low-quality evidence), mortality before discharge (2 studies; 229 infants; RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.75), corneal opacity requiring corneal transplant (1 study; 286 eyes; RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.26), or lens opacity requiring cataract removal (3 studies; 544 eyes; RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.79). The risk of recurrence of ROP requiring retreatment also did not differ between groups (2 studies; 193 infants; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.63; RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.07; very low-quality evidence). Subgroup analysis showed a significant reduction in the risk of recurrence in infants with zone I ROP (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.62), but an increased risk of recurrence in infants with zone II ROP (RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01 to 6.32). Pooled analysis of studies that reported eye-level outcomes also revealed significant increase in the risk of recurrence of ROP in the eyes that received bevacizumab (RR 5.36, 95% CI 1.22 to 23.50; RD 0.10, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17). Infants who received intravitreal bevacizumab had a significantly lower risk of refractive errors (very high myopia) at 30 months of age (1 study; 211 eyes; RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.20; RD -0.40, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.30; low-quality evidence).When used in combination with laser therapy, intravitreal pegaptanib was found to reduce the risk of retinal detachment when compared to laser/cryotherapy alone (152 eyes; RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.55; RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.16; low-quality evidence). The incidence of recurrence of ROP by 55 weeks' postmenstrual age was also lower in the pegaptanib + laser therapy group (76 infants; RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.7; RD -0.35, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.16; low-quality evidence). There was no difference in the risk of perioperative retinal haemorrhages between the two groups (152 eyes; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.56; RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.05; very low-quality evidence). However, the risk of delayed systemic adverse effects with any of the three anti-VEGF drugs is not known.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Implications for practice: Intravitreal bevacizumab/ranibizumab, when used as monotherapy, reduces the risk of refractive errors during childhood but does not reduce the risk of retinal detachment or recurrence of ROP in infants with type 1 ROP. While the intervention might reduce the risk of recurrence of ROP in infants with zone I ROP, it can potentially result in higher risk of recurrence requiring retreatment in those with zone II ROP. Intravitreal pegaptanib, when used in conjunction with laser therapy, reduces the risk of retinal detachment as well as the recurrence of ROP in infants with type 1 ROP. However, the quality of the evidence was very low to low for most outcomes due to risk of detection bias and other biases. The effects on other critical outcomes and, more importantly, the long-term systemic adverse effects of the drugs are not known. Insufficient data precludes strong conclusions favouring routine use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents - either as monotherapy or in conjunction with laser therapy - in preterm infants with type 1 ROP.
Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of anti-VEGF agents on structural and functional outcomes in childhood and delayed systemic effects including adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在胎儿期血管生成中起关键作用。研究人员最近尝试使用抗VEGF药物治疗早产儿视网膜病变(ROP),这是一种血管增生性疾病。这些药物在患有ROP的早产儿中的安全性和有效性目前尚不确定。
评估抗VEGF药物作为单一疗法(即不联合冷冻疗法或激光疗法)或与计划性冷冻/激光疗法联合使用时,对1型ROP早产儿(定义为I区任何阶段伴plus病、I区3期伴或不伴plus病、或II区2期或3期伴plus病)的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL 2016年第11期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2016年12月11日)、Embase(1980年至2016年12月11日)、CINAHL(1982年至2016年12月11日)以及会议论文集。
评估抗VEGF药物与传统疗法相比在ROP早产儿中给药的疗效或安全性或两者兼有的随机或半随机对照试验。
我们使用标准的Cochrane和Cochrane新生儿方法进行数据收集和分析。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。
六项试验共纳入383名婴儿,符合纳入标准。五项试验比较玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(n = 4)或雷珠单抗(n = 1)与传统激光疗法(单一疗法),而第六项研究比较玻璃体内注射培加他尼联合传统激光疗法与激光/冷冻疗法(联合疗法)。作为单一疗法使用时,贝伐单抗/雷珠单抗未降低完全或部分视网膜脱离的风险(3项研究;272名婴儿;风险比(RR)1.04,95%置信区间(CI)0.21至5.13;风险差(RD)0.00,95%CI -0.04至0.04;极低质量证据)、出院前死亡率(2项研究;229名婴儿;RR 1.50,95%CI 0.26至8.75)、需要角膜移植的角膜混浊(1项研究;286只眼;RR 0.34,95%CI 0.01至8.26)或需要白内障摘除的晶状体混浊(3项研究;544只眼;RR 0.15,95%CI 0.01至2.79)。需要再次治疗的ROP复发风险在两组之间也无差异(2项研究;193名婴儿;RR 0.88,95%CI 0.47至1.63;RD -0.02,95%CI -0.12至0.07;极低质量证据)。亚组分析显示,I区ROP婴儿的复发风险显著降低(RR 0.15,95%CI 0.04至0.62),但II区ROP婴儿的复发风险增加(RR 2.53,95%CI 1.01至6.32)。对报告眼部结局的研究进行汇总分析还显示,接受贝伐单抗治疗的眼中ROP复发风险显著增加(RR 5.36,95%CI 1.22至23.50;RD 0.10,95%CI 0.03至0.17)。接受玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗的婴儿在30个月大时发生屈光不正(高度近视)的风险显著降低(1项研究;211只眼;RR 0.06,95%CI 0.02至0.20;RD -0.40,95%CI -0.50至-0.30;低质量证据)。与单独的激光/冷冻疗法相比,玻璃体内注射培加他尼与激光疗法联合使用时可降低视网膜脱离的风险(152只眼;RR 0.26,95%CI 0.12至0.55;RD -0.29,95%CI -0.42至-0.16;低质量证据)。培加他尼 + 激光疗法组在月经后55周时ROP复发的发生率也较低(76名婴儿;RR 0.29,95%CI 0.12至0.7;RD -0.35,95%CI -0.55至-0.16;低质量证据)。两组围手术期视网膜出血的风险无差异(152只眼;RR 0.62,95%CI 0.24至1.56;RD -0.05,95%CI -0.16至0.05;极低质量证据)。然而,三种抗VEGF药物中任何一种的延迟全身不良反应风险尚不清楚。
对实践的启示:玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗/雷珠单抗作为单一疗法使用时,可降低儿童期屈光不正的风险,但不能降低1型ROP婴儿视网膜脱离或ROP复发的风险。虽然该干预措施可能降低I区ROP婴儿ROP复发的风险,但可能会导致II区ROP婴儿需要再次治疗的复发风险更高。玻璃体内注射培加他尼与激光疗法联合使用时,可降低1型ROP婴儿视网膜脱离以及ROP复发的风险。然而,由于存在检测偏倚和其他偏倚,大多数结局的证据质量非常低至低。这些药物对其他关键结局的影响,更重要的是其长期全身不良反应尚不清楚。数据不足,无法得出支持在1型ROP早产儿中常规使用玻璃体内抗VEGF药物(无论是单一疗法还是与激光疗法联合使用)的确切结论。
需要进一步研究评估抗VEGF药物对儿童期结构和功能结局以及延迟全身效应(包括不良神经发育结局)的影响。