• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康素养水平和对受邀参加结直肠癌筛查计划的看法。

Health literacy levels and views about being invited to a colorectal cancer screening program.

机构信息

a Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.

b Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2018 Jun;57(6):743-749. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1420911. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2017.1420911
PMID:29308944
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sweden has not yet implemented a national screening program for colorectal cancer, but a nationwide study is ongoing; the Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO). Previous research shows that the use of health care services, together with several health-related outcomes, is associated with an individual's level of health literacy. However, the relation between health literacy and participation in colorectal cancer screening has produced varying results reported within the few studies addressing this issue and therefore, further research is warranted.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The aim was to explore health literacy and views about being invited to screening, among participants and non-participants in a national colorectal cancer screening program. They were randomly sampled to fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy and a mixed methods approach was applied, using questionnaires, focus group discussions and interviews.

RESULTS

The majority of individuals, whether they were participants or non-participants in the SCREESCO program, had an acceptable level of health literacy and no significant differences in health literacy levels between the groups were found. Participants expressed that it was important and appreciated to be able to choose information sources on an individual basis. Among non-participants, the importance of receiving invitations with a clear message that quickly draws one's attention was highlighted. However, both groups expressed a positive outlook towards the invitation. The mixed methods approach revealed that findings from interviews and focus group discussions corresponded to items in the health literacy scales.

CONCLUSION

A majority of individuals displayed acceptable levels of health literacy, regardless of whether they chose to participate or not. Similarities between the groups were seen in the qualitative findings regarding views of the invitation. Currently, the SCREESCO invitation letter is distributed by regular mail, but in the future a more dynamic approach could be valuable to increase clarity in the message about importance of screening.

摘要

背景

瑞典尚未实施全国性的结直肠癌筛查计划,但正在进行一项全国性研究,即瑞典结肠筛查(SCREESCO)。先前的研究表明,医疗保健服务的使用以及与健康相关的多种结果与个体的健康素养水平相关。然而,健康素养与结直肠癌筛查参与之间的关系在少数研究中存在差异,因此需要进一步研究。

材料和方法

本研究旨在探讨参加和未参加全国结直肠癌筛查计划的参与者的健康素养和对被邀请参加筛查的看法。他们是通过粪便免疫化学试验或结肠镜检查随机抽样的,采用问卷调查、焦点小组讨论和访谈相结合的混合方法。

结果

大多数参与者,无论是参加还是未参加 SCREESCO 计划,其健康素养水平都处于可接受水平,且两组之间的健康素养水平无显著差异。参与者表示,能够根据个人情况选择信息来源非常重要且受到赞赏。在未参与者中,突出强调了收到带有明确信息且能迅速引起关注的邀请的重要性。然而,两组都对邀请持积极态度。混合方法的结果表明,访谈和焦点小组讨论的发现与健康素养量表的项目相符。

结论

大多数参与者的健康素养水平都处于可接受水平,无论他们是否选择参加。两组在邀请的看法方面的定性发现存在相似之处。目前,SCREESCO 的邀请信通过普通邮件分发,但在未来,更具动态性的方法可能会提高关于筛查重要性的信息的清晰度,从而更有价值。

相似文献

1
Health literacy levels and views about being invited to a colorectal cancer screening program.健康素养水平和对受邀参加结直肠癌筛查计划的看法。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jun;57(6):743-749. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1420911. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.
3
Psychometric properties of the SCREESCO questionnaire used in a colorectal cancer screening programme-A Rasch analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查项目的SCREESCO问卷的心理测量特性——拉施分析
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):541-550. doi: 10.1111/jep.13301. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
4
Accessibility of standardized information of a national colorectal cancer screening program for low health literate screening invitees: A mixed method study.针对健康素养较低的结直肠癌筛查受邀者的国家结直肠癌筛查计划标准化信息的可及性:一项混合方法研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):327-336. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
5
Translation and cultural adaption of the decisions module for colorectal cancer screening into a Swedish version - the SCREESCO questionnaire.将结直肠癌筛查决策模块翻译成瑞典语版本并进行文化调适——SCREESCO问卷
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1248-1252. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1357751. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
6
Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.基于人群的免疫化学粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌:两种邀请策略的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):e317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 5.
7
The importance of people's values and preferences for colorectal cancer screening participation.人们对结直肠癌筛查参与的价值观和偏好的重要性。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):1079-1084. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw266.
8
Different information needs-The major reasons for calling the helpline when invited to colorectal cancer screening.不同的信息需求-受邀参加结直肠癌筛查时拨打热线的主要原因。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1548-1554. doi: 10.1111/hex.13496. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake.提高结直肠癌筛查参与度的策略的定性评估。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Jan;57(1):e7-15.
10
A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Literacy and Awareness, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer and Its Screening in Riyadh Region.利雅得地区关于结直肠癌及其筛查的读写能力、认知、态度和信念的横断面评估
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Jun;33(3):660-667. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1129-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Health literacy assessment and analysis of influencing factors in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus in Southwest China.中国西南地区妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的健康素养评估及影响因素分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1477706. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477706. eCollection 2024.
2
Making the BEST decision-the BESTa project development, implementation and evaluation of a digital Decision Aid in Swedish cancer screening programmes- a description of a research project.制定最佳决策—— BESTa 项目:在瑞典癌症筛查计划中开发、实施和评估数字决策辅助工具——一个研究项目的描述。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 12;18(12):e0294332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294332. eCollection 2023.
3
Men's Perception of Being Invited for Prostate Cancer Testing and the Information About Its Pros and Cons-A Survey from Two Population-based Testing Programmes.
男性对受邀进行前列腺癌检测及其利弊信息的认知——来自两项基于人群的检测项目的调查
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 May 2;52:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.012. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Different information needs-The major reasons for calling the helpline when invited to colorectal cancer screening.不同的信息需求-受邀参加结直肠癌筛查时拨打热线的主要原因。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1548-1554. doi: 10.1111/hex.13496. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender.结直肠癌筛查的相关方面、方法、年龄和性别。
J Intern Med. 2021 Apr;289(4):493-507. doi: 10.1111/joim.13171. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study.丹麦一项公共资助筛查项目中健康素养与结直肠癌筛查接受情况的关联:横断面研究
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 29;19:101132. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Psychometric properties of the SCREESCO questionnaire used in a colorectal cancer screening programme-A Rasch analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查项目的SCREESCO问卷的心理测量特性——拉施分析
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):541-550. doi: 10.1111/jep.13301. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
8
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.