• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的信息需求-受邀参加结直肠癌筛查时拨打热线的主要原因。

Different information needs-The major reasons for calling the helpline when invited to colorectal cancer screening.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1548-1554. doi: 10.1111/hex.13496. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13496
PMID:35393757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327847/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study pertains to the design of a decision aid (DA) to shed light on information and support needs in colorectal cancer screening, with the aim to explore the calling patterns to the Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) study's helpline.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with data from documented telephone calls to the SCREESCO study, including individuals, 59-60 years, randomized to colonoscopy or high sensitive faecal immunochemical test (FIT).

RESULTS

More than 2000 calls (women 58.5%; colonoscopy 59%) were analysed. Calling patterns: unsubscribing from screening, confirmation of participation, logistical concerns about the screening procedure, counselling, and FIT screening difficulties or in need of a new FIT test. Comorbidity was the most frequent reason for unsubscribing and most of the counselling calls included questions about the FIT test or the colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Most of the calls to the helpline seemed to be related to individuals' lack of understanding about the organization of the screening programme and the screening procedure. Therefore, we find it important to further stress the tailoring part in our DA developing process, that is, provide limited information initially, with the possibility of access to more, if desired by the individual, still with respect to the individual's needs, health and digital literacy.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Individuals representing the public and invited to SCREESCO participated since we analysed their calls to the helpline. The findings will contribute to our continued work with the DA where the public will contribute and participate.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在设计一个决策辅助工具(DA),以阐明结直肠癌筛查中的信息和支持需求,目的是探讨对 Screening of Swedish Colons(SCREESCO)研究热线的呼叫模式。

方法

采用横断面研究方法,对 SCREESCO 研究中记录的电话呼叫数据进行分析,包括年龄为 59-60 岁、随机分配至结肠镜检查或高敏感粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)的个体。

结果

分析了超过 2000 个电话(女性 58.5%;结肠镜检查 59%)。呼叫模式:取消筛查、确认参与、对筛查程序的后勤问题、咨询、FIT 筛查困难或需要新的 FIT 测试。合并症是取消筛查的最常见原因,大多数咨询电话都包含关于 FIT 测试或结肠镜检查的问题。

结论

大多数热线电话似乎与个体对筛查计划和筛查程序的理解不足有关。因此,我们认为在我们的 DA 开发过程中进一步强调定制部分非常重要,即最初提供有限的信息,如果个体有需求,可以访问更多信息,但仍要尊重个体的需求、健康和数字素养。

患者和公众参与

代表公众并受邀参加 SCREESCO 的个体参与了我们对热线电话的分析。这些发现将有助于我们继续进行 DA 的工作,公众将在此过程中提供意见和参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f297/9327847/7c8737767979/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f297/9327847/7c8737767979/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f297/9327847/7c8737767979/HEX-25--g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Different information needs-The major reasons for calling the helpline when invited to colorectal cancer screening.不同的信息需求-受邀参加结直肠癌筛查时拨打热线的主要原因。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1548-1554. doi: 10.1111/hex.13496. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.
3
Once-only colonoscopy or two rounds of faecal immunochemical testing 2 years apart for colorectal cancer screening (SCREESCO): preliminary report of a randomised controlled trial.一次性结肠镜检查或每两年进行两轮粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠癌筛查(SCREESCO):一项随机对照试验的初步报告
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;7(6):513-521. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00473-8. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
4
The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.苏格兰基于结直肠癌筛查的个人化风险信息对比阳性/阴性结果对知情选择和接受结肠镜检查意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6734-0.
5
Two sides of every coin: individuals' experiences of undergoing colorectal cancer screening by faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy.硬币都有两面:个体接受粪便免疫化学测试和结肠镜筛查结直肠癌的体验。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;31(6):1290-1295. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab171.
6
Health literacy levels and views about being invited to a colorectal cancer screening program.健康素养水平和对受邀参加结直肠癌筛查计划的看法。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jun;57(6):743-749. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1420911. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
7
Cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.高敏粪便免疫化学试验与结肠镜筛查结直肠癌的成本效益比较。
Br J Surg. 2017 Jul;104(8):1078-1086. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10536. Epub 2017 May 31.
8
Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.粪便免疫化学试验与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验:临床医生和结直肠癌筛查计划组织者需要了解的内容。
Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1327-37. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Gender, having a positive FIT and type of hospital are important factors for colonoscopy experience in colorectal cancer screening - findings from the SCREESCO study.性别、FIT 结果阳性和医院类型是结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜检查体验的重要因素——来自 SCREESCO 研究的结果。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;55(11):1354-1362. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1820568. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden.做出最佳决策——BESTa项目:瑞典癌症筛查数字决策辅助工具开发中设计阶段和阿尔法阶段的描述
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y.
2
Making the BEST decision-the BESTa project development, implementation and evaluation of a digital Decision Aid in Swedish cancer screening programmes- a description of a research project.制定最佳决策—— BESTa 项目:在瑞典癌症筛查计划中开发、实施和评估数字决策辅助工具——一个研究项目的描述。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 12;18(12):e0294332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294332. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Once-only colonoscopy or two rounds of faecal immunochemical testing 2 years apart for colorectal cancer screening (SCREESCO): preliminary report of a randomised controlled trial.一次性结肠镜检查或每两年进行两轮粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠癌筛查(SCREESCO):一项随机对照试验的初步报告
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;7(6):513-521. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00473-8. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators influencing the cancer screening behaviour among people with intellectual disabilities.一项系统评价:影响智障人士癌症筛查行为的障碍和促进因素。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;76:102084. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102084. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Two sides of every coin: individuals' experiences of undergoing colorectal cancer screening by faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy.
硬币都有两面:个体接受粪便免疫化学测试和结肠镜筛查结直肠癌的体验。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;31(6):1290-1295. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab171.
4
Making decisions on your own: Self-administered decision aids about colorectal cancer screening - A systematic review and meta-analyses.自行决策:关于结直肠癌筛查的自我管理决策辅助工具 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Mar;105(3):534-546. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.035. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Layperson Views about the Design and Evaluation of Decision Aids: A Public Deliberation.非专业人士对决策辅助工具的设计和评估的看法:公众讨论。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jul;41(5):527-539. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21998980. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Decision-making about participation in colorectal cancer screening in Sweden: Autonomous, value-dependent but uninformed?瑞典人参与结直肠癌筛查的决策:自主、依赖价值观但却不知情?
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Barriers to, and facilitators of, access to cancer services and experiences of cancer care for adults with a physical disability: A mixed methods systematic review.身体残疾成年人获得癌症服务的障碍和促进因素,以及他们的癌症护理体验:一项混合方法系统评价。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jan;13(1):100844. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100844. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
8
The LEAD trial-The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial.LEAD 试验 - 丹麦未参与基于 FIT 的结直肠癌筛查的教育程度较低的公民在决策方面的决策辅助工具的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):359-368. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels.开发并初步测试了一款针对不同健康素养水平人群的结直肠癌筛查决策辅助工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Oct;102(10):1847-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.029. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Developing a Self-Administered Decision Aid for Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tailored to Citizens With Lower Educational Attainment: Qualitative Study.为受教育程度较低的公民量身定制基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查自我管理决策辅助工具:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2018 May 22;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/formative.9696.