David J. Meyers (
Vincent Mor is a professor in the Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, and a health scientist at the Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):78-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0714.
Unlike fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare, most Medicare Advantage (MA) plans have a preferred network of care providers that serve most of a plan's enrollees. Little is known about how the quality of care MA enrollees receive differs from that of FFS Medicare enrollees. This article evaluates the differences in the quality of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) that Medicare Advantage and FFS beneficiaries entered in the period 2012-14. After we controlled for patients' clinical, demographic, and residential neighborhood effects, we found that FFS Medicare patients have substantially higher probabilities of entering higher-quality SNFs (those rated four or five stars by Nursing Home Compare) and those with lower readmission rates, compared to MA enrollees. The difference between MA and FFS Medicare SNF selections was less for enrollees in higher-quality MA plans than those in lower-quality plans, but Medicare Advantage still guided patients to lower-quality facilities.
与按服务收费(FFS)的医疗保险不同,大多数医疗保险优势(MA)计划都有一个首选的护理提供者网络,为计划的大多数参保者提供服务。对于医疗保险优势计划参保者接受的护理质量与 FFS 医疗保险参保者有何不同,人们知之甚少。本文评估了 2012-14 年间医疗保险优势计划和 FFS 受益人的熟练护理设施(SNF)的质量差异。在控制了患者的临床、人口统计学和居住社区影响后,我们发现与 MA 参保者相比,FFS 医疗保险患者进入更高质量的 SNF(由 Nursing Home Compare 评为四星或五星)的可能性要大得多,且再入院率也更低。与 FFS 医疗保险相比,高质量医疗保险优势计划的参保者和低质量医疗保险优势计划的参保者之间在 SNF 的选择上的差异较小,但医疗保险优势计划仍然将患者引导至低质量的设施。